Wave Optics Problems: Diffraction Grating #1 & #2

AI Thread Summary
A diffraction grating with 500 lines/mm diffracts light at 30 degrees, leading to an initial calculation of wavelength as 1000nm, which is incorrect; the correct wavelength is 500nm, determined using the equation d*sin(θ) = nλ, where n=2 is necessary to yield a visible wavelength. For the second problem, with a slit spacing of 0.0002m and a screen distance of 2.0m, the first bright fringe distance of 0.004m leads to a calculated wavelength of 400nm using the formula d*sin(θ). The calculations for both problems emphasize the importance of correctly applying the diffraction grating equations. Clarifications and corrections were provided by participants in the discussion. The thread highlights common pitfalls in calculating wavelengths using diffraction gratings.
G01
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
2,704
Reaction score
19
#1 A diffraction grating having 500lines/mm diffracts visible light at 30 degrees(\pi/6) What is its wavelength?

the distance between slits is .002mm(500l^-1)

d\sin\frac{\pi}{6} = \lambda = 1000nm, which is too big. The answer is 500nm. What am I doing wrong?

#2

The slit spacing in a diffration grating is .0002m. The screen is 2.0m behind the grating. The distance of the first bright fringe is .004m. What is the wavelength of light?

y = L\tan\theta
\tan^{-1}.004/2 = \theta = .0019
d\sin\theta = \lambda
.0002m\sin(.0019) = \lambda = 400nm

If this is right then I read from a graph wrong. If this is wrong, then I would appreciate anybody's input. Thank you for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
G01 said:
#1 A diffraction grating having 500lines/mm diffracts visible light at 30 degrees(\pi/6) What is its wavelength?

the distance between slits is .002mm(500l^-1)

d\sin\frac{\pi}{6} = \lambda = 1000nm, which is too big. The answer is 500nm. What am I doing wrong?
.

The correct equation is

d\sin\frac{\pi}{6} = n \lambda

where is an integer. since n=1 gives you a result out of the visible spectrum (in the infrared), you try n=2, which gives something in the visible.


Pat
 
AHHH icic, very simple now that I see it. Anybody for # 2
 
bumping the thread...
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top