Why Is Infinite Velocity Characteristic of Diffusion Processes?

AI Thread Summary
A wave propagates at a speed less than the speed of light, regardless of the wave type. The diffusion model assumes infinite propagation speed for simplification, despite actual speeds being finite. In practical scenarios, propagation speeds are typically much faster than diffusion speeds. For example, in heat conduction through metal, diffusion speed is around mm/s, while propagation speed can exceed 100 m/s. This idealization allows for effective modeling of diffusion processes.
fisico30
Messages
362
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

a wave propagates at a speed (group of phase speed), less than the speed of light, no matter what type of wave we are dealing with (electromagnetic, mechanical,...).

Why is infinite velocity characteristic of a diffusion process? What does that mean?
For something to diffuse it always take some finite amount of time..


thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The diffusion model assumes infinite propagation speed to make the equations easier. In practice, the propagation speed is usually much faster than the diffusion speed (though not infinite), so the idealization works pretty well. Consider heat conduction through a metal: the diffusion speed might be on the order of mm/s, while the propagation speed is related to the speed of sound, which may be >100 m/s.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top