Wave speed at different tensions of copper wire

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on an A2 physics investigation involving the wave speed in copper wire at different tensions. The experiment utilized a SWG26 copper wire with a 0.5A current, measuring oscillation frequency as tension varied. The participant applied the formula for natural frequency to analyze results but sought validation for their findings. They initially struggled to find relevant wave speed values for SWG26 wire at varying tensions in textbooks and online resources. Ultimately, the participant resolved their inquiry independently.
stevexn
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
hi, sorry if this is in the wrong section, but I am new to the forum!

Im doing an A2 physics investigation, and have pretty much completed it all, an got a good set of results, but i need to prove that they are right!

i have been using a simple set up by applying a 0.5A current through a SWG26 (0.45mm) copper wire, passed between two magnets, and applying varying tensions to it, to change the frequency at which it oscillates.

i have done this, taken all of the required readings, and then used the following equation to find the natural frequency

ƒ = 1 x √ T
2l μ

where:
l – Length of wave
ƒ - Frequency of oscillation
T - Tension
μ - Mass per unit length of the wire
and 1 has been used to replace the wave speed, because i was given it in a txt book along with the equation

i now need to prove that this equation is giving me the right results. I can apparently find whether it is or not by finding values for the velocity of waves through copper wire of the same gauge as mine (SWG26) at different tensions, but i have looked through textbooks and on the internet and can't find anything relavent, so i would be greatful if someone can give me some values for this, or anything that might help me find another way of proving my work (and preferably something or someone that i can reference in my work)

if anyone can help and need more information about the experiment, just ask an ill post some more details.

cheers

Steve
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dont worry, I've sovled it now!
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top