Wave speed of a transversing guitar string?

magician13134
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm completely stuck on a homework question and I really don't even know where to start...

A guitar string is vibrating in its fundamental mode, with nodes at each end. The length of the segment of the string that is free to vibrate is 0.382 m. The maximum transverse acceleration of a point at the middle of the segment is 9000 m/s2 and the maximum transverse velocity is 3.90 m/s.

Part (a) asked "What is the amplitude of this standing wave?" and I was able to correctly get A=1.69×10−3m

Now part (b) is asking "What is the wave speed for the transverse traveling waves on this string?" and I don't even know what equations to use. If someone could just point me in the right direction, tell me a useful equation, or give me a little hint, that would be great :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So what you probably did to solve a) was this:

\frac{a_{max}}{v_{max}} = \omega

\frac{v_{max}}{\omega} = A

You know that v = \lambda f or alternatively v = \frac{2\pi f}{\frac{2\pi}{\lambda}} = \frac{\omega}{k}

You know omega from a) and you can figure out k easily so that's what you should do for b).
 
AtticusFinch said:
So what you probably did to solve a) was this:

\frac{a_{max}}{v_{max}} = \omega

\frac{v_{max}}{\omega} = A

You know that v = \lambda f or alternatively v = \frac{2\pi f}{\frac{2\pi}{\lambda}} = \frac{\omega}{k}

You know omega from a) and you can figure out k easily so that's what you should do for b).

Ok, so I'm trying to work that out, but I still can't seem to get the right answer.

So I know \omega = 9000/3.9 = 2308 and that v = \frac{\omega}{\frac{2\pi}{\lambda}} and... I think \lambda = 4L, right? So I got 561.2, but apparently that's not right. Did I mess up with \lambda = 4L (using 0.382 for L) or is there something else I'm missing? :confused:

Oh, and thanks!Oh shoot, \lambda = 4L is only for tubes, isn't it... Shoot. Ok, I'll keep working at it.
 
magician13134 said:
Oh shoot, \lambda = 4L is only for tubes, isn't it... Shoot. Ok, I'll keep working at it.

Yes it's only for tubes. You need to find what the wavelength would be for a string with nodes at both ends (just draw a wave that only has two nodes).
 
It was \lambda = 2L, so the answer was just 281Thanks for your help :biggrin:
 
magician13134 said:
It was \lambda = 2L, so the answer was just 281


Thanks for your help :biggrin:

Yep, good job.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top