Wave Velocity: Improper approach, or incorrect differentiation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving for the displacement and velocity of a transverse wave represented by the equation D(x, t) = 0.19sin(2.9x - 35t). The displacement at x = 0.62 m and t = 8.6*10^-2 s was correctly calculated as -0.18 m. However, the user encountered difficulties when attempting to find the velocity, suspecting an error in differentiation. The derivative was attempted but yielded an incorrect result, prompting suggestions to review the chain rule for proper differentiation. Clarification on the correct approach to finding the velocity is sought to resolve the issue.
rusty65
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A transverse wave on a cord is given by D(x, t) = 0.19sin(2.9x - 35t), where D and x are in m and t is in s.
1) At t = 8.6*10^-2 s, what is the displacement of the point on the cord where x = 0.62 m?
2) At t = 8.6*10^-2 s, what is the velocity of the point on the cord where x = 0.62 m?

Homework Equations



given displacement ---> D(x, t) = 0.19sin(2.9x - 35t)

The Attempt at a Solution



I didnt have any trouble finding the displacement of the wave along the cord (-0.18m) as all I had to do was plug in the given values of x and t, then make sure my calculator was in radians.

The velocity is where I ran into problems. I figured it shouldn't be any harder than taking the derivative of the given equation, then once again plugging in the supplied values. However, I did not come up with the correct answer, and I not sure if I simply differentiated incorrectly or if that is not even the correct approach. Heres my work:

0.19sin(2.9x - 35t) ---> ∂D/∂t = 0.19cos(2.9x - 35t) * (2.9 - 35t)
∂D/∂t = 0.19cos(2.9x - 35t) * (2.9 - 3.01) = (-0.11)*0.19cos(2.9x - 35t)
∂D/∂t = -0.0209cos(2.9x - 35t)
∂D/∂t = -0.0209cos(-1.212)
∂D/∂t = -0.007338 m/s

But, like I said, ∂D/∂t =/= -0.007338 m/s

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rusty65 said:
0.19sin(2.9x - 35t) ---> ∂D/∂t = 0.19cos(2.9x - 35t) * (2.9 - 35t)
Try this derivative again. Review the chain rule.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top