Wavefunction collapse and measurement

wduff
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
So, rookie question, I know, but I'm having a little trouble with the idea of wavefunction collapse as it pertains to stationary states:

If a measurement of energy collapses a wavefunction into an energy eigenstate, it stays there forever (unless perturbed). But my impression is that although position measurements collapse a wavefunction, the wavefunction will begin to evolve rather quickly after the measurement.

Does this have something to do with the fact that x doesn't commute with H? What are some other measurements that will yield an evolving wavefunction?

Say I have some operator associated with an observable that has two values: 'happy' and 'sad.' What else do I need to know about this situation to predict whether a measurement of 'happy' will leave the particle in that state for all time?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, it has to do with whether or not the operator A corresponding to the measurement you are doing commutes with the Hamiltonian H. H governs the time evolution of the wave function. A measurement of A will collapse the system into an eigenstate of A. If A commutes with H, the system will remain in that eigenstate of A as it evolves in time as determined by H. If A and H don't commute, then it will be in an eigenstate of A immediately after the measurement, but will then begin evolving into some linear combination of all the eigenstates of A as time passes.
 
Okay, makes sense. Thanks for your time phyzguy, glad to hear I wasn't too far from home there!
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top