Wavefunction Degeneracy in Spherically Symmetric Infinite Well Potential

  • Thread starter Thread starter Qbit42
  • Start date Start date
Qbit42
Messages
45
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The radial portion of the wavefunction of a particle contained in a spherically symmetric infinite well potential (ie U= infinite outside a certain radius "a" and 0 inside the radius) is given by the spherical Bessel functions.

J_{l}(kr) = (\frac{-r}{k})^{l}(\frac{1}{r}\frac{d}{dr})^{l}\frac{Sin(kr)}{kr}

I need to answer various questions for wavefunctions of different l values. One is the degeneracy of the state. For all of the l values in question (0-3) I get energy as a function of only 1 quantum number (n). This means to me that each state is not degenerate. However if none of the states are degenerate then the problem seems kinda simple. So my question is this, Do you consider degeneracy of each individual state by looking at the individual quantum numbers that specifically show up in the energy relation for that state or do I need to account for the l value of the wavefunction somehow?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If 'l' does not appear in the equation for energy, that means that all of the values of 'l' are degenerate. That's basically the definition of degeneracy.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top