Wavefunction normalization vs 1/√(|x| )

Maharshi Roy
Messages
25
Reaction score
1
In Griffith quantum mechanics, it is written that for a wavefunction to be normalizable, it is essential that the wavefunction approaches zero before 1/ √(|x|) as x tends to infinity...
Please explain from where this condition has been derived.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The idea is that the wave function must be square integrable, so it must fall off to zero faster than functions which aren't.

Or put another way, integrate \left( 1/\sqrt{|x|}\right)^2 and see what you get.
 
There are square integrable functions which don't fall off to 0 when going to infinity. Griffiths' condition nicely singles out the so-called Schwartz test functions.
 
You're right. I guess I should have said that the wave function must be square integrable and satisfy all other physical conditions of wave functions. (It certainly would be weird if the probability of finding the particle infinitely far away is non-zero.)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top