Wavelet Theory: Solving ∫t^pψ(t)dt=0
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
Mathematics news on Phys.org
- 17,871
- 1,653
It's an approximation method - follows from the definitions in eqs. 5.12-13 on p79.
Can you see how 5.14 and 5.15 are obtained?
Can you see how 5.14 and 5.15 are obtained?
omer21
- 24
- 0
i can see 5.14 but i can not obtain 5.15 and 5.16.
Actually i get [itex]\sum_k (-1)^kc_k.0=0[/itex] instead of [itex]\sum_k (-1)^k k^p c_k=0[/itex] from the integral [itex]∫t^p [\sum_k (-1)^kc_k \phi(2t+k-N+1)]dt=0[/itex].
Actually i get [itex]\sum_k (-1)^kc_k.0=0[/itex] instead of [itex]\sum_k (-1)^k k^p c_k=0[/itex] from the integral [itex]∫t^p [\sum_k (-1)^kc_k \phi(2t+k-N+1)]dt=0[/itex].
- 17,871
- 1,653
Then you should go back over the derivations and make sure you understand what they are saying ... starting from the latest that you appear to be able to follow:
5.14 was the case for p=0.
i.e. ##\phi(t)## is capable of expressing only the zeroth monomial.
therefore, the zeroth-order moment of the wavelet function must be zero.
Which is to say...
$$\int_{-\infty}^\infty \psi(t)dt=0$$ ... which, to my mind, means that ##\psi## must be odd... which places limits on the expansion coefficients as the book says.
5.15 was the case for p=1 ... so ##\phi(t)## is capable of expressing up to the first monomial.
therefore, the zeroth and first-order moment of the wavelet function must be zero.
the zeroth order moment is above. The first order is given by...
$$\int t\psi(t)dt =0$$ ... so what steps did you follow from here?
5.14 was the case for p=0.
i.e. ##\phi(t)## is capable of expressing only the zeroth monomial.
therefore, the zeroth-order moment of the wavelet function must be zero.
Which is to say...
$$\int_{-\infty}^\infty \psi(t)dt=0$$ ... which, to my mind, means that ##\psi## must be odd... which places limits on the expansion coefficients as the book says.
5.15 was the case for p=1 ... so ##\phi(t)## is capable of expressing up to the first monomial.
therefore, the zeroth and first-order moment of the wavelet function must be zero.
the zeroth order moment is above. The first order is given by...
$$\int t\psi(t)dt =0$$ ... so what steps did you follow from here?
omer21
- 24
- 0
I substituted
[itex]\psi(t)=[∑_k(−1)^kc_k\phi(2t+k−N+1)][/itex]
into
[itex]∫t\psi(t)dt[/itex].
Then i got
[itex]∫t[∑_k(−1)^kc_k\phi(2t+k−N+1)]dt=∑_k(−1)^kc_k∫t\phi(2t+k−N+1)]dt=0[/itex].
Actually i am not sure how to find the above integral but i did some change of variables and used integration by parts however i could not reach [itex]∑_k(−1)^kkc_k[/itex].
[itex]\psi(t)=[∑_k(−1)^kc_k\phi(2t+k−N+1)][/itex]
into
[itex]∫t\psi(t)dt[/itex].
Then i got
[itex]∫t[∑_k(−1)^kc_k\phi(2t+k−N+1)]dt=∑_k(−1)^kc_k∫t\phi(2t+k−N+1)]dt=0[/itex].
Actually i am not sure how to find the above integral but i did some change of variables and used integration by parts however i could not reach [itex]∑_k(−1)^kkc_k[/itex].
Similar threads
- Raccoonn
- · Replies 1 ·
- Nuclear Engineering
- Replies
- 1
- no_alone
- · Replies 2 ·
- Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
- Replies
- 2
- jbowers9
- · Replies 3 ·
- Calculus
- Replies
- 3