Waves in opposite directions in a wire

  • Thread starter Thread starter Karol
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Waves Wire
AI Thread Summary
Two cosine waves with an amplitude of 2.5 cm and a wavelength of 5 cm are traveling in opposite directions along a wire at a velocity of 6 mm/s. The discussion raises questions about the initial conditions for the waves, specifically whether they start at an angle of zero. It emphasizes that without additional physical constraints, such as the length of the wire or boundaries, the origin for time and length can be chosen freely. The distinction between graphing the shape of the wire versus the waves is also highlighted, suggesting that they may be confused but can represent different aspects of wave behavior. Overall, the conversation focuses on the complexities of wave interactions and graphing techniques in this context.
Karol
Messages
1,380
Reaction score
22

Homework Statement


2 crosswise cosine waves of amplitude 2.5 cm and wavelength 5 cm are traveling in opposite directions in a wire with velocity 6 mm/s. draw graphs of the wire at times t=0, 2 and 4 sec.

Homework Equations


Waves propagating to the right: ##y=A\cos 2\pi \left( \frac{x}{\lambda}-\frac{t}{T} \right)##
Waves propagating to the left: ##y=A\cos 2\pi \left( \frac{x}{\lambda}+\frac{t}{T} \right)##

The Attempt at a Solution


Isn't it necessary to give the initial conditions at t=0? i mean what was the starting angle of each wave, or is it obvious that they both started with ##\theta=0## but in opposite directions, like in the drawing?
 

Attachments

  • Snap1.jpg
    Snap1.jpg
    8.5 KB · Views: 481
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are given no other information than what you wrote above, then you can safely treat the wire as infinitely long ... so you are free to place the origin for time and length anywhere you like: it makes no difference to the physics anyway so you may as well make a choice that provides the least work ;)

OTOH: if you have other physical information - i.e. the length of the wire, the presence of a wall, etc - then you have to take that into account when you make your choices: don't just assume something - work it out. i.e. at the wall the amplitude is forced to a specific value.

Note: you have been asked for a graph of the wire, not the waves.
 
I was asked a graph of the shape of the wire, but isn't it the only graph possible? what is a graph of the wire and what is the graph of the waves? aren't they the same thing? i didn't learn anything else but the shape of the waves in a wire
 
You could do a graph of each wave separately or of the superposition of the two waves.
You could also graph properties other than the transverse displacement.
There's lots of graphs you could do - but the wave vs wire thing is a likely confusion.

A particular wave on a wire may be composed of a large number of components - in this case there are two.
 
  • Like
Likes Karol
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top