Way to force certain mutations to happen

  • Thread starter Thread starter Virtuous
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force
AI Thread Summary
Mutation is primarily a random process, particularly in natural settings, driven by the inherent error rates of DNA and RNA polymerases. While it is possible to influence mutation rates through techniques like genetic engineering or transgenics, these methods do not guarantee specific mutations. Instead, they can increase the likelihood of desired genes being incorporated into an organism's DNA through various manipulations, such as altering the environment or using enzymes. Although directed mutation techniques are currently limited, researchers can induce specific types of mutations by applying known mutagens or conditions that predictably alter base pairs. Reverse genetics is another approach where mutations are introduced to identify genes linked to specific traits. Overall, while mutations can be influenced, achieving precise, targeted mutations remains a challenge in genetic research.
Virtuous
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I read that mutation is random, I am wondering if this is true, and if so; is it ever possible to by-pass it even if its completely inefficient method.

I guess I would be talking about DNA, I don't know much but anything.

Basically I am trying to see if there is a way to force certain mutations to happen, even if it takes several mutations to accomplish it.
 
Biology news on Phys.org


I'm not entirely sure what you're trying to ask, but perhaps you're referring to something like transgenics or genetic engineering? It is still random, but you can enrich the media your cells are in with the gene you want to splice in, then use enzymes to open up the DNA, along with other manipulations like temperature changes, to increase the probability that the gene you want spliced in gets taken up by the cell.
 


Natural gene mutation really is a random event. Polymerases, which make new strands of DNA and RNA, are not perfectly accurate molecules. RNA polymerase has an error rate of approximately 1/10^3bp, and DNA polymerase has an error rate of approximately 1/10^6 bp. It is this minute error rate that allows natural selection to drive evolution.

As for your second question asking whether or not it is possible to cause a specific mutation (i think you mean phenotype) to appear, the answer would be, at the time, no. this is because directed mutation is not an available technique at the time. Using transposable elements, one can cause mutations to occur, but they are largely random, or confined to specific areas of the genome. However, this methodology is obsolete. We can cause specific phenotypes to show in an organism by directly adding or removing pieces of DNA- so there is no need to mutate a cell in order to cause a specific phenotype to appear.

The technique of inducing mutation is a commonly used protocol in reverse genetics- where one seeks to find the gene responsible for an attribute by mutating segments of DNA until the attribute is no longer observed.

Also, one can cause specific TYPES of mutations (U>A or C>G) to occur, because it is possible to predict what mutation a base pair will undergo if you subject it to UV light, mutagens, etc.

Hope this was helpful
 


Yeah that's perfect thanks.
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top