Understanding Weak Interaction Field in Beta Decay

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the understanding of the weak interaction as a field-based phenomenon, similar to gravity and electromagnetism. The initial confusion stems from the perception that weak interactions, like beta decay, occur randomly without the influence of a field. However, comparisons of field strengths suggest that the weak interaction must indeed have a field component. Participants highlight that both weak interactions and electromagnetic interactions are governed by field equations, which dictate the behavior of particles during decay processes. Clarification on the role of the weak field in events like beta decay remains sought after.
DocZaius
Messages
365
Reaction score
11
I've had trouble understanding how the weak interaction could be field based, like classical gravity, or electromagnetism. My limited understanding of the interaction so far had been that left handed leptons and quarks would have an event spontaneously happen to them (such as decay). I thought that such events would be based on simple random probability. Now of course the factors that contribute to what particle does what when are not so simple. But still I did not think that a field played a role in this interaction. Yet when I read comparisons of field strengths of the weak interaction with others, I infer that for there to be such a comparison, the weak interaction would have to be field based. Can someone elaborate on the role the weak field plays in events such as, for example, beta decay?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suppose from the lack of reply that my question was ill-posed. If someone that has a vague understanding of my question would have a better way of phrasing it, I would appreciate it. Or at least if someone would describe the field properties of the weak interaction in any way, I would appreciate it as well. Thank you!
 
Hi DocZaius! :smile:

I'm not clear on it myself, but I think the weak-field basis for eg beta decay is the same as the electromagnetic-field basis for an excited electron "decaying" to a more stable orbit …

in both cases, you'd think the original resonance could keep going for ever, you don't know when it will wobble off, but you do know it's governed by a field equations when it does.

that's my two-cents-worth … :redface:
 
Thread 'Is there a white hole inside every black hole?'
This is what I am thinking. How much feasible is it? There is a white hole inside every black hole The white hole spits mass/energy out continuously The mass/energy that is spit out of a white hole drops back into it eventually. This is because of extreme space time curvature around the white hole Ironically this extreme space time curvature of the space around a white hole is caused by the huge mass/energy packed in the white hole Because of continuously spitting mass/energy which keeps...
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top