Website title: Finding Rotation Matrices for Arbitrary Angle Rotations in R^3

owlpride
Messages
210
Reaction score
0
I am looking for two rotation matrices M1 and M2, which describe a rotation by an arbitrary angle around the axes passing through (0,0,0) and (1,1,1), and (1,0,0) and (2,1,1). All relative to the standard basis. How would I approach this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
owlpride said:
I am looking for two rotation matrices M1 and M2, which describe a rotation by an arbitrary angle around the axes passing through (0,0,0) and (1,1,1), and (1,0,0) and (2,1,1). All relative to the standard basis. How would I approach this problem?

Hi owlpride! :wink:

Those two axes are parallel, so I suppose you could relate them by a translation. :smile:
 
I am very well aware that they are parallel. That's how I chose them :) That being said, I don't even know how to get the initial rotation... Maybe some change of basis to get one basis vector parallel to the axis of rotation and the other two vectors in the orthogonal plane? And then the standard cos, sine, -sine, cos transformation?
 
owlpride,

It turns out that there is a nice way to do this that isn't too hard. I learned it from working a homework problem in "a brief on tensor analysis" by Simmonds (a really good book). If you draw this out I think it will make sense. Let \mathbf{\hat{e}} denote a unit vector in the direction of your axis of rotation. you can construct the matrix that will take an arbitrary vector \mathbf{u} and rotate it (right handed) an angle \vartheta about the axis to get a new vector \mathbf{v}. To do this you form an orthogonal basis out of \mathbf{\hat{e}} , \mathbf{\hat{e} \times u}, and \mathbf{\hat{e} \times \left( \hat{e} \times u \right)}. After normalizing the basis vectors, you just find the projection of \mathbf{v} onto the basis vectors and do a page of algebra to simplify. The Answer you get is

\mathbf{v}=\cos \vartheta \mathbf{u} + \left(1-\cos \vartheta \right) \mathbf{\hat{e}} \left( \mathbf{\hat{e} \cdot u}\right) + \sin \vartheta \mathbf{\hat{e} \times u} = T \mathbf{u}.

Thus,

T=\cos \vartheta I + \left(1-\cos \vartheta \right) \mathbf{\hat{e}\hat{e}} + \sin \vartheta \mathbf{\hat{e} \times }.

The notation above is old-fashioned. I is the identity matrix, and the meaning of \mathbf{\hat{e}\hat{e}} and \mathbf{\hat{e} \times} can be deduced from the equation for \mathbf{v}.

The matrix you want is the coordinate rotation matrix, R, which is R=T^{-1}=T^{T}, since rotation matrices are orthogonal.


This will take care of your first case. The second case is offset from the origin so a matrix won't do the job by itself - you also need an offset.

Jason
 
What I would do is find a matrix that represents that rotation around the z-axis:
\begin{bmatrix}cos(\theta) & -sin(\theta) & 0 \\ sin(\theta) & cos(\theta) & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1\end{bmatrix}

then multiply by the matrix that rotates the z-axis into the given axis of rotation.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top