Weighing In on Different Planets: Radii and Mass

AI Thread Summary
A planet with a larger radius but the same mass as Earth would result in a lower gravitational pull due to the increased distance from the planet's center. Gravity decreases with the square of the distance, meaning that if the radius is three times larger, the gravitational force experienced would be reduced to one-ninth of what it is on Earth. This is because a larger radius implies a more hollow structure, leading to a weaker gravitational attraction. Therefore, a person's weight would decrease significantly on such a planet. Understanding the relationship between mass, radius, and gravity is crucial to grasping these concepts.
lep007
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose you went to another planet having a larger radius than Earth but having the same total mass as Earth. Would this affect your weight? How?


Homework Equations


Not applicable...? I think.


The Attempt at a Solution


I don't really understand what radius and mass has to do with weight, sorry.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to the forum. There are some eqns that could be of value, but for now do you know how gravity varies with distance?
 
I think the gravitational force should get smaller when the distance becomes larger, right?
 
indeed it does, and in fact is an example where it falls with the square of the distance, that is twice as far, 1/4 the force. What you likely are not acquainted with is the idea Newton developed that if you could condense all the matter of the Earth into a small marble in the center, gravitational force would be the same as it is now.
 
I'm sort of confused; I know the one's mass wouldn't change, but if the radius was 3x larger than Earth's and yet the mass of the planet was the same, the planet would be more hollow, which means a lesser pull of gravity, which means weight would decrease?
 
bingo! the force from the mass in both cases is the same--picture those marbles of high density matter in the center and a person "standing" at R distance and 3R. The weight would be 1/9 on the fluffier planet.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top