Weight and Force in a Hanging Cabin

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about a man standing on a weighing machine inside a hanging cabin, the key points revolve around the forces acting on both the man and the cabin. For part (a), when the cabin is at rest, the weight shown by the machine is 15 kg, as the normal force and tension balance the gravitational forces. In part (b), to measure his correct weight, the man must exert a force that results in an upward acceleration, leading to a calculated tension of 1800 N. The confusion regarding normal forces and frames of reference is clarified by recognizing that internal forces do not affect the overall force balance. The final equations confirm that the approach taken is valid, ensuring the correct understanding of the forces involved.
f(x)
Messages
182
Reaction score
0
« Laws of Motion » problem

Homework Statement


A man of mass = 60 kg is standing on a weighing machine inside an cabin (of mass = 30kg). The cabin is hanging from a pulley fixed to the ceiling through a light rope, the other end of which is held by the man himself.
a) If the man manages to keep the cabin at rest, what is the weight shown by the machine ?
b) What force must he exert to get his correct weight ?


2. What I feel :rolleyes:
since the man is holding the rope himself, a tension T is acting on him upwards. His weight is acting downwards. In case a) , there's no acceleration.
Normal rxn. N is also upwards.
So, N+T= mg , where m is the mass of the man.
Also T balances the downward force of the lift and the man.
so, T= (M+m)g - T
Is this argument correct ? I am specially confused about the Normal forces . I get the correct answer with this but I have not included the normal force in the second equation...and I am supposed to consider all the forces . Does it cancel out ?

for b), he must accelerate the cabin upwards to get his correct weight. Let the acc. be a, then, in the cabin's frame of ref. -:
N+T-mg=ma (ma is pseudo force)
or, N+T=m(a+g) <-- Here N must be 60g to get correct weight.
So i get T=60a
Now in Earth's frame,
T-((M+m)g-T)=(M+m)a <--I have used (M+m)g-T to denote downward force
Solving, I get a=30, hence T=1800N

Actually, i have worked backwards from the answers to get these equations, and hence I am in doubt whether they are correct or not. In this case, the equation in Earth's frame considers force due to (M+m)g-T but the acceleration is for (M+m) only ! Why ?

Any help is appeciated

3. Answers
a)15 kg
b) 1800 N
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
a. It's correct.

It is more convenient if you consider the man and the cabin as the whole thing. By that, the total force acting on the whole thing is 2T-(m+M)g=0

The N forces between the man and the cabin are just internal ones.

b. Considering like a), you only see the whole thing going up with acceleration a, Newton's law 2 now is:

2T-(m+M)g=(m+M)a

which is the same as you derived.

BTW,

in the cabin's frame of ref. -:
N+T-mg=ma (ma is pseudo force)


is not true.

you are still in the Earth's frame, the right-hand side is the result of the net force in the left hand side.

If you want to write in the frame sticked with the cabin, it should be:
N+T-mg-ma=0 zero because the cabin sees you standing rest, and ma now is the pseudo force. Of course, the result must be the same.
 
Thx for the help Weimin, much appreciated :biggrin:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top