Weird algebra and logic in a mechanics cart quesiton

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the mechanics of a physics problem involving the equation $$-F_d = ma_3$$ and the drag force equation $$F_d = \kappa v^2$$, where ##\kappa = 0.030 \, \text{kg m}^{-1}##. Participants express confusion regarding the derivation of these equations and the logic behind approximations used in the problem. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the context of the problem, particularly in relation to ignoring drag forces when they are negligible compared to gravitational forces. Additionally, the use of LaTeX for rendering equations is emphasized as a necessary skill for clarity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's second law of motion
  • Familiarity with drag force equations in physics
  • Basic knowledge of approximations in scientific calculations
  • Proficiency in LaTeX for mathematical typesetting
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of drag force equations in fluid dynamics
  • Learn about the significance of approximations in physics problems
  • Explore advanced LaTeX techniques for rendering complex equations
  • Review Newton's laws and their applications in mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for physics competitions, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in mastering the application of equations in physics problems.

aspodkfpo
Messages
148
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
Q 12 C)
Page 13

https://www.asi.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/NQE_2009_Physics_solutions.pdf
Relevant Equations
−Fd = ma3
vb = le^-k/m*0
v = vb e^-kx/m
Logic and equations seem to have come out of nowhere in this question. I have been unable to understand where these equations come from and why they are used.

Can someone describe the logic for the steps in the question?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aspodkfpo said:
Relevant Equations:: −Fd = ma3
If the link is not permanent, this thread becomes worthless at some point.

Even then, please learn to properly render and explain all variables used
Rendering: use buttons for subscript and superscript, or better: learn a litttle ##\LaTeX##
(There's a good tutorial on LaTeX here.)

The equation reads $$-F_d = ma_3$$
and further up in this puzzle you dump on us it says ##F_d = \kappa v^2## with ##\kappa = 0.030 ## kg m -1
What exactly, is unclear ?
aspodkfpo said:
Logic and equations seem to have come out of nowhere in this question
They claim it comes from the 'useful information'. Did you miss that ?
 
You ask about 12 (c) ; does that mean you did and understood 12 (b) completely ?

I must admit that I find 12 (b) rather demanding: they intended you to ignore the drag, solely because at ##\approx##0.2 m/s2 it is much smaller than ##g\sin\theta## at 4.9 m/s2 .

(plus a cryptic chunk of 'useful information'
In physics it is often useful to make approximations. This can simplify your calculations, and if the approximation you make is appropriate, it won’t change your result appreciably. For example, if you know that A = B + C and that C is much, much smaller than B, you may be able to say that A = B and get the same result as you would have using A = B + C. If you make an approximation you must demonstrate that it is valid.​
but who is to say 4% is acceptable ?)

I know it's the science olympics, but asking this kind of judgment is unscientific to me.

I assume the 'useful information' is provided together with the exercise, not only with the solutions ?

In that case, what part of the logic escapes you ?

##\ ##
 
BvU said:
You ask about 12 (c) ; does that mean you did and understood 12 (b) completely ?

I must admit that I find 12 (b) rather demanding: they intended you to ignore the drag, solely because at ##\approx##0.2 m/s2 it is much smaller than ##g\sin\theta## at 4.9 m/s2 .

(plus a cryptic chunk of 'useful information'
In physics it is often useful to make approximations. This can simplify your calculations, and if the approximation you make is appropriate, it won’t change your result appreciably. For example, if you know that A = B + C and that C is much, much smaller than B, you may be able to say that A = B and get the same result as you would have using A = B + C. If you make an approximation you must demonstrate that it is valid.​
but who is to say 4% is acceptable ?)

I know it's the science olympics, but asking this kind of judgment is unscientific to me.

I assume the 'useful information' is provided together with the exercise, not only with the solutions ?

In that case, what part of the logic escapes you ?

##\ ##
12b) was fine, I could do it, was not sure about the -k/m x becoming - k/m 0 or how they get the equations for the first few lines. Will look at it again.

How would I observe latex code in non-linear form when typing? i.e. \ frac a b isn't in text.
 
aspodkfpo said:
How would I observe latex code in non-linear form when typing? i.e. \ frac a b isn't in text.
Use the preview button.
 
haruspex said:
Use the preview button.
aspodkfpo said:
12b) was fine, I could do it, was not sure about the -k/m x becoming - k/m 0 or how they get the equations for the first few lines. Will look at it again.

How would I observe latex code in non-linear form when typing? i.e. \ frac a b isn't in text.

## \frac {-b \pm \sqrt{b^2 -4ac}} {2a} ##

- why does this not work?
 
enclose in ## ... ## for inline math, in $$... $$ for displayed math
 
aspodkfpo said:
\frac {-b \pm \sqrt{b^2 -4ac}} {2a}

- why does this not work?
Because you did not wrap it up in either a pair and of double hashes (# #...# #, but without the spaces) or a pair of double dollar signs:
##\frac {-b \pm \sqrt{b^2 -4ac}} {2a}##
$$\frac {-b \pm \sqrt{b^2 -4ac}} {2a}$$
 

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K