Weird singularities/cylindrical & spherical coordinates

AxiomOfChoice
Messages
531
Reaction score
1
If you consider the vector function (expressed in cylindrical coordinates)
<br /> \frac{1}{\rho} \hat{\phi}<br />
where \rho = \sqrt{x^2+y^2}, you notice it has a singularity at the origin ONLY. But if you express this in spherical coordinates, what you get is
<br /> \frac{1}{r\sin \theta} \hat{\phi},<br />
which is singular whenever \theta = 0 or \theta = \pi; that is, on the entire z axis! (I got this by just substituting the identities x = r\sin \theta \cos \phi and y = r \sin \theta \sin \phi into the above expression for \rho.) How can this be? I'm doing something wrong, but what?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Uhhh...sorry, I was being really dumb. \rho = 0 includes the z-axis in cylindrical coordinates. FML.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top