We all know that the axiom of choice is equivalent to the existence of a well-ordering for any set. And, this of course implies that [tex]\mathbb{R}[/tex] can be well-ordered, in particular. However, how do we know that the axiom of choice is actually(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); neededin the case of the reals? That is, if we remove the axiom of choice, do the reals become a set that cannot be well-ordered? Furthermore, is the axiom of choice needed for every uncountable set?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Well-ordering of the Reals

Loading...

Similar Threads for ordering Reals | Date |
---|---|

I Order of "Extracted Factors" in SPSS Factor Analysis | Jul 24, 2017 |

A Transcription from SQL to FOL (First Order Logic) | Jun 3, 2017 |

A First order logic : Predicates | Jun 1, 2017 |

Why can't the well ordering of the reals be proven with Dedikind cuts without AC? | Apr 1, 2010 |

Well-ordering of reals | Jun 19, 2009 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**