B Were all the particles or matter one?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Allen_Wolf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matter Particles
Allen_Wolf
Messages
48
Reaction score
4
Were all the particles or matter a single particle in the beginning?
If so were all forms of energy and and matter one single unit?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Allen_Wolf said:
Were all the particles or matter a single particle in the beginning?
If so were all forms of energy and and matter one single unit?
No, to both questions.

There's really not much more that can be said in response, so this thread is closed.
However, there are a number of threads in the cosmology section on conditions shortly after the big bang, and if you work through some of these you may be able to ask a more specific question clarifying what you found there.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top