What actually are Newton's axioms of classical mechanics

AI Thread Summary
Newton's axioms of classical mechanics are often encapsulated in his three laws of motion, which describe the relationship between forces and motion. There is debate on whether these laws should be considered separate statements or collectively as a single axiom. The discussion highlights the challenge of expressing Newton's formulation in standard mathematical language, contrasting it with other formulations like Hamiltonian mechanics. It is noted that Newton's approach was not strictly axiomatic, as he relied on Euclidean geometry and empirical observations rather than a formalized set of axioms. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in defining these foundational principles within the context of classical mechanics.
V0ODO0CH1LD
Messages
278
Reaction score
0
Just like the Euler-Lagrange differential equation
$$ \frac{\partial{\mathcal{L}}}{\partial{q}} = \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial{\mathcal{L}}}{\partial{\dot{q}}} $$
the hamiltonian equations
$$ \frac{\partial{H}} {\partial{q}} = -\dot{p} $$
$$ \frac{\partial{H}} {\partial{p}} = \dot{q} $$
and the poisson equation
$$ \left\{F,H\right\} = \dot{F} $$
are axioms to different formulations of classical mechanics. What are the axioms of the Newtonian formulation?

Are his three laws separate statements that together make up the axiom? Or are the laws the actual axioms? In which case, can the Newtonian formulation of classical mechanics be explicitly formulated in "standard" mathematical language?

EDIT: by non-"standard" I mean like the fact that ## F_{12}=-F_{21} ## makes no sense if not followed by subtitles. And that it only makes sense in a very specific context..
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think Newton worked axiomatically - in Principia he used Euclids axioms for geometry implicitly, and used that framework to describe/record observations and the results of experiments.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top