What am I doing wrong in this nodal/mesh analysis problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tahayassen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a nodal/mesh analysis problem, focusing on the participant's approach to solving the problem and the potential errors in their calculations and unit usage. The scope includes technical reasoning related to circuit analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant points out that there is a mix of milliAmperes (mA) and Amperes (A) in the calculations, suggesting that consistent units should be used.
  • Another participant questions the origin of the value "0.6" used in the determination of V2, indicating that if it is derived from the current through R4, the units must be properly accounted for.
  • There are multiple instances of participants acknowledging each other's contributions, indicating a back-and-forth exchange regarding the analysis.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correctness of the initial approach, with some pointing out specific errors while others engage in clarifying the issues raised. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the resolution of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential missing assumptions regarding the circuit elements and the need for clarity on the units used in calculations. The discussion does not resolve these issues.

tahayassen
Messages
269
Reaction score
1
Question and attempt in attachments.
 

Attachments

  • q.png
    q.png
    16.5 KB · Views: 486
  • a.jpg
    a.jpg
    16.2 KB · Views: 458
Physics news on Phys.org
You're making a mess by mixing mA with A. Stick to consistent units & you'll be OK.
 
In your determination of V2 you haven't specified where the "0.6" comes from. If it's from figuring the current through R4 then make sure you've accounted for the units used.

EDIT: Scooped by rude_man!
 
gneill said:
EDIT: Scooped by rude_man!

As he was by you, several times!
 
Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K