What Are Acoustical and Optical Branches in Crystal Waves?

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
My book considers waves in crystals. Especially it develops the idea of acoustical and optical branches of the waves. From what I can see these are different ways the dispersion of our phonon may look like. It is developed when the crystal contains more than one atom per unit cell, but I am not sure why this is. Do we not have acoustical and optical branches for a wave in any crystal regardless of how many atoms we have per unit cell and what their mass ratio might be?
Also I am not sure what dispersion even means. It is a relationship between the phase velocity and the wavelength (or wavevector k), but what is the physical meaning of this quantity. When a physicist describes different kinds of dispersion in a crystal is he then describing different forms of wavemotion that can occur in the crystal?
Maybe my question is kind of confusing but I just want to clear up some things that my books explains quite poorly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For acoustic phonons all of the motions are in phase ... just as with classical sound. Everything else is an optical phonon.

Dispersion is a property of waves in matter: if the velocity varies with the wavelength, then the relationship which describes this is the dispersion relation. In optics this is connected to the index of refraction; in a vacuum (n=1) there is no dispersion. Likewise for ordinary acoustics there is almost no dispersion in air, but it can be very important for ultrasound in biological systems.

For a crystal the speed of sound can vary according to the direction of travel ...

For more details see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phonon#Dispersion_relation

Kittel's "Introduction to Solid State Physics" is a great reference whenever you get confused - very easy to follow.
 
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top