What Are Complex Numbers and How Can Beginners Start Learning About Them?
- Thread starter MissP.25_5
- Start date
Click For Summary
Complex numbers can be approached by starting with the equation involving cosine and Euler's formula, specifically \(\cos z = \frac{1}{2}(e^{iz} + e^{-iz})\). To solve equations like \(\cos(z) = 2\), it is crucial to consider the periodic nature of cosine, which leads to multiple solutions. The complex logarithm is introduced to find solutions, with the principal value being \(\mathrm{Cos}^{-1}(2) = \imath \mathrm{Cosh}^{-1}(2) = \imath \mathrm{Ln}(2+\sqrt{3})\). The discussion emphasizes that all solutions can be expressed by adding integer multiples of \(2\pi\) to the principal value, reflecting the periodicity of the cosine function. Understanding these concepts is essential for beginners learning about complex numbers.
Physics news on Phys.org
benorin
Science Advisor
- 1,442
- 191
probably ought to start with \cos z = \frac{1}{2}\left(e^{iz}+e^{-iz}\right), substituting into the given equation we have
\frac{1}{2}\left(e^{iz}+e^{-iz}\right)=2
now multiply both sides by 2e^{iz} and collect all the terms on one side...
\frac{1}{2}\left(e^{iz}+e^{-iz}\right)=2
now multiply both sides by 2e^{iz} and collect all the terms on one side...
MissP.25_5
- 329
- 0
benorin said:probably ought to start with \cos z = \frac{1}{2}\left(e^{iz}+e^{-iz}\right), substituting into the given equation we have
\frac{1}{2}\left(e^{iz}+e^{-iz}\right)=2
now multiply both sides by 2e^{iz} and collect all the terms on one side...
Why must we multiply both sides by 2e^{iz} ?
Nick O
- 158
- 8
Do it, and see what you end up with. I think you'll agree that it becomes much easier find the set of solutions for z.
Nick O
- 158
- 8
Very close! You're just missing one part to capture the periodic nature of cosine.
MissP.25_5
- 329
- 0
Nick O said:Very close! You're just missing one part to capture the periodic nature of cosine.
Which part? I don't understand. I thought that would be enough?
Nick O
- 158
- 8
If cos(z) = 2, what is cos(z+2pi)?
Nick O
- 158
- 8
I'll be honest and say that I don't know how to produce the extra term from that particular solution, but that's only because I'm missing something that someone else will probably pick up. The term is there nonetheless, which you will see (I believe) if you solve it with Euler's identity instead of u-substitution.
CAF123
Gold Member
- 2,918
- 87
From ##e^{iz} = 2\pm \sqrt{3}\Rightarrow iz = \ln (2 \pm \sqrt{3})##, you can expand the RHS, taking into consideration the fact the complex logarithm is multiple valued.MissP.25_5 said:Which part? I don't understand. I thought that would be enough?
MissP.25_5
- 329
- 0
CAF123 said:From ##e^{iz} = 2\pm \sqrt{3}\Rightarrow iz = \ln (2 \pm \sqrt{3})##, you can expand the RHS, taking into consideration the fact the complex logarithm is multiple valued.
So how should I solve this question? I guess my working is alright up to this part, right?
lurflurf
Homework Helper
- 2,459
- 159
in fact by convention the principle value is
$$\mathrm{Cos}^{-1}(2)=\imath\, \mathrm{Cosh}^{-1}(2)=\imath\, \mathrm{Ln}(2+\sqrt{3})$$
to find all solutions recall that
$$\cos(-x)=\cos(x) \\
\text{and for any integer k}\\
\cos(x +2k\, \pi)=\cos(x)$$
$$\mathrm{Cos}^{-1}(2)=\imath\, \mathrm{Cosh}^{-1}(2)=\imath\, \mathrm{Ln}(2+\sqrt{3})$$
to find all solutions recall that
$$\cos(-x)=\cos(x) \\
\text{and for any integer k}\\
\cos(x +2k\, \pi)=\cos(x)$$
CAF123
Gold Member
- 2,918
- 87
It is, the method is fine. Given ##z \in \mathbb{C},## what is ##\log_{e} z##?MissP.25_5 said:So how should I solve this question? I guess my working is alright up to this part, right?
MissP.25_5
- 329
- 0
lurflurf said:in fact by convention the principle value is
$$\mathrm{Cos}^{-1}(2)=\imath\, \mathrm{Cosh}^{-1}(2)=\imath\, \mathrm{Ln}(2+\sqrt{3})$$
I don't get that part. How do you calculate that?
MissP.25_5
- 329
- 0
CAF123 said:It is, the method is fine. Given ##z \in \mathbb{C},## what is ##\log_{e} z##?
##\log_{e} z## = loge(x+iy)
Is that correct?
CAF123
Gold Member
- 2,918
- 87
It is not what I meant for you to write down - have you studied the complex logarithm?MissP.25_5 said:##\log_{e} z## = loge(x+iy)
Is that correct?
lurflurf
Homework Helper
- 2,459
- 159
Same way you did.MissP.25_5 said:I don't get that part. How do you calculate that?
$$\mathrm{Cos}^{-1}(2)=\imath\, \mathrm{Cosh}^{-1}(2)=\imath\, \mathrm{Ln}(2+\sqrt{3})\sim 1.316957896924816708625046347307968444026981971\imath
$$
is the principal value.
That is the agreed reference value we give when we give only one value.
To find all values you do not need to deal with complex logs (though you could).
Just think back to real trigonometry.
We found one value call it P
then -P was another
then we could add 2n ∏
Once we find one solution, we then find them all
what are all solutions to
$$\cos(x)=2$$
is done the same way as
what are all solutions to
$$\cos(x)=0.2$$
MissP.25_5
- 329
- 0
CAF123 said:It is not what I meant for you to write down - have you studied the complex logarithm?
Yes, I have. But I don't know how to use that here.
MissP.25_5
- 329
- 0
lurflurf said:Same way you did.
$$\mathrm{Cos}^{-1}(2)=\imath\, \mathrm{Cosh}^{-1}(2)=\imath\, \mathrm{Ln}(2+\sqrt{3})\sim 1.316957896924816708625046347307968444026981971\imath
$$
is the principal value.
That is the agreed reference value we give when we give only one value.
To find all values you do not need to deal with complex logs (though you could).
Just think back to real trigonometry.
We found one value call it P
then -P was another
then we could add 2n ∏
Once we find one solution, we then find them all
what are all solutions to
$$\cos(x)=2$$
is done the same way as
what are all solutions to
$$\cos(x)=0.2$$
Ok, so what do I do next? Am I supposed to expand that log part?
lurflurf
Homework Helper
- 2,459
- 159
how would you do the one with 0.2?
It is the same.
If t is any solutions and k is an integer
$$2k\, \pi\pm t$$
is all the solutions because
$$\cos(2k\, \pi\pm t)=\cos(t)$$
by properties of cos(x)
It is the same.
If t is any solutions and k is an integer
$$2k\, \pi\pm t$$
is all the solutions because
$$\cos(2k\, \pi\pm t)=\cos(t)$$
by properties of cos(x)
CAF123
Gold Member
- 2,918
- 87
MissP.25_5 said:Yes, I have. But I don't know how to use that here.
Ok, so you know that ##\log_e z = \text{Log}_e |z| + i\text{Arg}\,z + 2\pi k, \,\,k \in \mathbb{Z}##, where ##\log## is the complex log and ##\text{Log}## is the real log. Use this to obtain the full solution set of the equation ##iz = \ln(2\pm \sqrt{3})##.
Alternatively, as lurflurf said, make it clear that you solved for the principal value and, using the properties of the cosine, tag on a ##2\pi k.##
MissP.25_5
- 329
- 0
lurflurf said:how would you do the one with 0.2?
It is the same.
If t is any solutions and k is an integer
$$2k\, \pi\pm t$$
is all the solutions because
$$\cos(2k\, \pi\pm t)=\cos(t)$$
by properties of cos(x)
Are you saying that I have to something like this?
Attachments
MissP.25_5
- 329
- 0
CAF123 said:Ok, so you know that ##\log_e z = \text{Log}_e |z| + i\text{Arg}\,z + 2\pi k, \,\,k \in \mathbb{Z}##, where ##\log## is the complex log and ##\text{Log}## is the real log. Use this to obtain the full solution set of the equation ##iz = \ln(2\pm \sqrt{3})##.
Alternatively, as lurflurf said, make it clear that you solved for the principal value and, using the properties of the cosine, tag on a ##2\pi k.##
But how do I find Arg(Z) here? What is the value of r?
MissP.25_5
- 329
- 0
CAF123 said:Ok, so you know that ##\log_e z = \text{Log}_e |z| + i\text{Arg}\,z + 2\pi k, \,\,k \in \mathbb{Z}##, where ##\log## is the complex log and ##\text{Log}## is the real log. Use this to obtain the full solution set of the equation ##iz = \ln(2\pm \sqrt{3})##.
Alternatively, as lurflurf said, make it clear that you solved for the principal value and, using the properties of the cosine, tag on a ##2\pi k.##
I'm not sure how to plug in the values. But this is my attempt.
Attachments
lurflurf
Homework Helper
- 2,459
- 159
You are over thinking
if we know the solution
$$t=\imath\, \mathrm{Ln}(2+\sqrt{3})$$
to find all solutions we consider the additive inverse and shifts by 2 k pi
$$t=2k\, \pi+\imath\, \mathrm{Ln}(2\pm \sqrt{3})=2k\, \pi\pm\imath\, \mathrm{Ln}(2+ \sqrt{3})$$
if we know the solution
$$t=\imath\, \mathrm{Ln}(2+\sqrt{3})$$
to find all solutions we consider the additive inverse and shifts by 2 k pi
$$t=2k\, \pi+\imath\, \mathrm{Ln}(2\pm \sqrt{3})=2k\, \pi\pm\imath\, \mathrm{Ln}(2+ \sqrt{3})$$
MissP.25_5
- 329
- 0
lurflurf said:You are over thinking
if we know the solution
$$t=\imath\, \mathrm{Ln}(2+\sqrt{3})$$
to find all solutions we consider the additive inverse and shifts by 2 k pi
$$t=2k\, \pi+\imath\, \mathrm{Ln}(2\pm \sqrt{3})=2k\, \pi\pm\imath\, \mathrm{Ln}(2+ \sqrt{3})$$
Wait, so I just have to add 2∏k, right? So that it rotates and rotates and they will return to the same value after each 2∏ rotation, so that will be all the solutions?
Is this right?
Attachments
lurflurf
Homework Helper
- 2,459
- 159
^Yes.
Do you intend you ln to be single valued, or multivalued?
cos has period 2pi so adding an integer multiple of 2pi does not change it
Do you intend you ln to be single valued, or multivalued?
cos has period 2pi so adding an integer multiple of 2pi does not change it
MissP.25_5
- 329
- 0
lurflurf said:^Yes.
Do you intend you ln to be single valued, or multivalued?
cos has period 2pi so adding an integer multiple of 2pi does not change it
Since the instruction says to find all solutions, doesn't that mean ln have to be multivalued? Multivalued means k>0, right? k=0 would be the principle value, which is single valued, isn't it?
Can you check the attachment?
Attachments
Last edited:
CAF123
Gold Member
- 2,918
- 87
##Z_{1,2} = 2 \pm \sqrt{3}## are both real numbers > 0 so ##\text{Arg}\, Z_{1,2} = 0.##MissP.25_5 said:But how do I find Arg(Z) here? What is the value of r?
##\log_e z = w \iff z = e^w##, where ##\log_e## on the LHS is the complex logarithm. In your case, $$\log_e e^{iz} = \log_e (2\pm \sqrt{3}) \Rightarrow iz = \dots $$
Expand using the definition of the complex log.
MissP.25_5
- 329
- 0
CAF123 said:##Z_{1,2} = 2 \pm \sqrt{3}## are both real numbers > 0 so ##\text{Arg}\, Z_{1,2} = 0.##
##\log_e z = w \iff z = e^w##, where ##\log_e## on the LHS is the complex logarithm. In your case, $$\log_e e^{iz} = \log_e (2\pm \sqrt{3}) \Rightarrow iz = \dots $$
Expand using the definition of the complex log.
Have I expanded correctly?
Is that the final answer?
Attachments
Similar threads
- Replies
- 5
- Views
- 2K
- · Replies 6 ·
- Replies
- 6
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 3
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 8
- Views
- 3K
- · Replies 2 ·
- Replies
- 2
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 2
- Views
- 2K
- · Replies 16 ·
- Replies
- 16
- Views
- 4K
- · Replies 20 ·
- Replies
- 20
- Views
- 2K
- · Replies 5 ·
- Replies
- 5
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 2
- Views
- 3K