What Are Contravariant and Covariant Tensors in Relativity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter yukcream
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Covariant
yukcream
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
Can anyone explain to me what is contravariant and covariant? I just know that they are tensors with specific transformation properties (from website of MathWorld), i also know that the relation between two is the -ve sign.
Then dose it mean that:
given a 4-velocity of a particle is the vector
u' = dx^i/ds then how about the covariant of u'?

furthermore

given u' = { 1/sqrt (1-V^2/C^2) , v/c sqrt (1-V^2/ C^2) , then I wnat to ask am I right that the covaritant of u is { -1/sqrt (1-V^2/C^2) , -v/c sqrt (1-V^2/ C^2)?

if yes i can't get the relation u'u_' =1 (u_' indicate a subscripts)

yukyuk
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One property that is easy to spot is that contravariant tensors are like vectors, little arrows in the tangent space you know, while covariant tensors are like differential operators. Indeed I think it is true that all the classical covariant tensors, except the metric itself, come from differntial operations, especially covariant differentiation. Because the Riemann-Christoffel or curvature tensor can be constructed as the difference between the second covariant derivatives of an arbitrary contravariant vector with opposite orders of differentiation, and the Ricci and Einstein tensors derive their contravariant components from R-C.
 
yukcream said:
Can anyone explain to me what is contravariant and covariant? I just know that they are tensors with specific transformation properties (from website of MathWorld), i also know that the relation between two is the -ve sign.
Then dose it mean that:
given a 4-velocity of a particle is the vector
u' = dx^i/ds then how about the covariant of u'?

furthermore

given u' = { 1/sqrt (1-V^2/C^2) , v/c sqrt (1-V^2/ C^2) , then I wnat to ask am I right that the covaritant of u is { -1/sqrt (1-V^2/C^2) , -v/c sqrt (1-V^2/ C^2)?

if yes i can't get the relation u'u_' =1 (u_' indicate a subscripts)

yukyuk

While the specific answer depends on your metric, this looks wrong.

On a practical level, in relativity you lower the index of your tensor with the metric, g_ab.

This means that given a vector u^a = (a,b), the contravariant vector is

(g_00*a + g_01*b, g_10*a + g_11*b)

The dot product of u^a u_a, the covariant and contravariant vectors, is supposed to give the "length" of the vector. In relativity, the vectors are generally 4-vectors, and the "length" of the vector is its invariant Lorentz interval. Your vector is a bit odd, having only 2 components - I'm assuming that one of them is probably time, and the other is probably some spatial dimension.

Your result would only work with a metric of
-1 0
0 -1

which is unlikely. A much more likely candidate would be either
-1 0
0 1

OR

1 0
0 -1

(both sorts of sign convention are used). This would be for a flat "Minkowski" space-time.


Because this is posted in the relativity forum, and not the math forum, I'm assuming you are asking about covariant and contravariant vectors in relativity. In other applications, the vectors could be 3-vectors, and the "length" the usual length.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top