What Are Embedded Axis Frames in Euler Equations?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the concept of embedded axis frames in the context of Euler's equations for rigid body motion. Participants explore the differences between embedded axis frames and other reference frames, the challenges of applying Euler's equations, and the implications for accurately predicting motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that Euler's equations are written in an embedded axis frame, which complicates obtaining the true motion of a body.
  • Another participant explains that Euler's equations simplify the general equations of motion for a rigid body when expressed in a frame where the moment of inertia tensor is diagonal, specifically along the principal axes.
  • Concerns are raised about the difficulty of accurately determining the principal axes and measuring moments of inertia, which can lead to chaotic motion predictions.
  • A participant seeks clarification on the definition and characteristics of an embedded axis frame, indicating uncertainty about its distinction from normal frames.
  • One response suggests that embedded axes are fixed with respect to the body, contrasting them with laboratory-fixed axes.
  • Another participant emphasizes that Euler's equations are valid only in a frame fixed to the body along its principal axes and at the center of mass or center of rotation.
  • There is a question about how to return to a normal frame after solving Euler's equations, with no general method provided but an indication that specific examples may offer clarity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding embedded axis frames and their implications for Euler's equations. There is no consensus on the definition or practical application of these frames, and multiple viewpoints on the challenges of using Euler's equations remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the potential for misunderstanding the definitions of embedded axis frames and the challenges associated with measuring inertia accurately, which may affect the application of Euler's equations.

commutator
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
my book says that it is actually difficult to get the true motion of a body by using these equations because it says that euler equations are written in embedded axis frame ...
what is an embedded axis frame?where is it different from normal frames that i used in before?after solving euler equations, how do i return to the normal frame??
any help will be highly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In theory, it's not all that difficult: "The polhode rolls without slipping on the herpolhode lying in the invariable plane."

Euler's equations are a simplification of the general equations of motion for a rigid body:

\boldsymbol I\frac{d\boldsymbol{\omega}}{dt} = \boldsymbol{\tau}_{\text{ext}} - \boldsymbol{\omega}\times(\boldsymbol I\boldsymbol{\omega})

Euler's equations result when the frame in which the moment of inertia tensor I is expressed makes than tensor diagonal (i.e., when the body axes are the principal axes of the rigid body).

In practice, finding those principal axes is rather difficult. One can define an orthogonal set of axes for a rigid body, but those (somewhat arbitrarily defined) axes typically are not the principal axes. The inertia tensor expressed in these body axis coordinates will have non-zero off-diagonal terms. Measuring the moments of inertia is a bit challenging; getting more than three or four places of accuracy is rather tough. Measuring the products of inertia is more than challenging. For some big, bulky objects it just cannot be done. Even when it can the accuracy is quite low. This low accuracy makes it rather difficult to accurately predict the behavior over any length of time. The motion essentially becomes chaotic.
 
thanks..:)
i think u are referrring to the principal axis that makes inertia tensor diagonal, but i am still in the dark about what an " embedded axis frame is" and its specialities..
am i missing something here?
thanks again.
 
Without context, it's a bit hard to answer your question. What text? What education level (high school physics, freshman, undergrad classical mechanics)?
 
I suppose "embedded axes" refers to axes fixed with respect to the body (in contrast to axes fixed with respect to the laboratory).
 
hi commutator! :smile:
commutator said:
my book says that it is actually difficult to get the true motion of a body by using these equations because it says that euler equations are written in embedded axis frame ...
what is an embedded axis frame?where is it different from normal frames that i used in before?

Euler's equations are valid only in a frame of reference fixed in the body along three (perpendicular) principal axes, and therefore rotating with it.

They are valid only if the origin of the axes is at the centre of mass, or at the centre of rotation.

(And the advantage of Euler's equations over the fixed-frame equations is that the moment of inertia tensor is changing in the latter, but not in the former, so you don't have to bother with its derivative.)

See the PF Library on Euler's equations for an extended explanation. :wink:
… after solving euler equations, how do i return to the normal frame??

I don't know of any general method, but in particular examples, it's usually fairly obvious …

did you have an example in mind?​
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K