What Are Fermions and Bosons in the Meson Quark Model?

Flavia
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
1) What is mean by fermion with half integer spin and boson with integer spin

Is that fermion, 1/2,3/2...
boson, 1,2,3

2) Why meson don't have q = +1, S = -1 or q = -1, S = +1 in term of quark model
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) Yes, the term "fermion" is referred to particle that have half integer spin (as you said 1/2, 3/2 and so on), while "boson" is referred to particle with integer spin. This have many consequences. First of all the wave function of N fermions must be antisymmetric under exchange of any two of this N fermions, while for bosons it has to be symmetric.

2) In term of quark model a "meson" is a particle composed by a quark and an anti-quark. There are six quarks in nature and their quantum numbers are (considering only charge and strangeness):

UP (u) Q=+2/3 S=0
DOWN (d) Q=-1/3 S=0
CHARM (c) Q=+2/3 S=0
STRANGE (s) Q=-1/3 S=-1
TOP (t) Q=+2/3 S=0
BOTTOM (b) Q=-1/3 S=0

The only way to have a meson with strangeness is to include a strange or anti-strange quark in its composition. So for example, if you want a meson with S=-1 you have to put a strange quark, but for the composition of mesons, the other element must be a anti-quark and as you can see from the list there is no way you can have a total charge Q=+1. The same reasoning is valid for the other combination S=+1 Q=-1.
 
Ok thanks! get it.

What is the differences between pion and muon?
 
A pion is a meson whereas a muon is part of a group of particles called leptons.
 
Also, in our current understanding a pion is a composed particle (is a meson) while the muon is known as an elementary particle.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top