What Are Good Low Work Function Materials for Photoelectric Effect Experiments?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around identifying suitable low work function materials for conducting experiments related to the photoelectric effect. Participants explore the challenges of transmitting light with sufficient energy through specific materials and the implications of work function on electron emission.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks materials with a work function lower than ~4 eV to facilitate the photoelectric effect, given limitations with light transmission through a BK7 window.
  • Another participant suggests Hamamatsu photocathodes, which reportedly have a low work function and high quantum efficiency at 400 nm.
  • A participant clarifies their experimental setup involving a monochromator and the need for a material that can emit electrons when exposed to ~3.5 eV photons.
  • Magnesium is proposed as a candidate material due to its work function of around 3.7 eV, which is lower than the photon energy available.
  • Concerns are raised regarding the impact of magnesium's oxide layer on its work function, with references to the potential effects of adsorbates on work function values.
  • A suggestion is made that cleaning methods, such as e-beam polishing, may be necessary to address the oxide layer issue.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on the suitability of magnesium and the effects of its oxide layer, indicating that multiple views on the topic remain without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights uncertainties regarding the stability of low work function materials and the effects of surface conditions on work function values, which are not fully resolved.

Lambduh
Messages
69
Reaction score
1
Hi Guys,

I wanted to do an experiment testing the photoelectric effect but am having trouble getting light with energy higher than ~4 eV(300nm) through my window into vacuum as it's made of BK7 instead of something like fused silica. Does anyone know of a good material to use with a work function lower than that so i can see some electrons?:)

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry i wasn't very clear. I have a Monochromater source with xenon/deuterium lamps. I want to shine light into a vacuum cell with a sample in it and then collect them at a positively biased cathode then read the current with a picoammeter. However the window on my vacuum cell doesn't transmit light below ~350nm so I'm trying to find a material that i can hit with ~3.5 eV photons and eject some electrons.

I can't seem to find a relatively stable compound with a low enough work function to use. I guess that makes sense because all of the stable compounds want to hold on to those electrons:) So any suggestions would be awesome.

Thanks again!:)

Mark
 
Magnesium has a work function of around 3.7 eV. That is lower than your photon energy.

Zz.
 
Hmm i'll definitely try it thanks! I'm curious though... because magnesium forms an oxide layer(which seems to be hard to remove) won't that affect the work function? Depending on the material I've read that even a monolayer of adsorbates can change the work function by up to ~1eV.

Thanks again:)
 
Lambduh said:
Hmm i'll definitely try it thanks! I'm curious though... because magnesium forms an oxide layer(which seems to be hard to remove) won't that affect the work function? Depending on the material I've read that even a monolayer of adsorbates can change the work function by up to ~1eV.

Thanks again:)

Then you will have to do some form of cleaning, such as e-beam polishing, in situ in vaccum.

Zz.
 
Cool. Thanks for the info Zz.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K