Could we have negative dimensions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimension Negative
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the concept of negative dimensions, suggesting that if dimensions can be non-integer, then negative dimensions could also be defined. This notion is proposed to generalize the Hausdorff dimension, emphasizing that negative values are relative to an origin, similar to angles. The idea of "signed" measures is introduced, indicating that negative dimensions could represent a relative decrease in dimension or information. The conversation also touches on the implications of empty sets, noting that they can possess varying degrees of emptiness. Overall, the thread delves into the theoretical possibilities of extending dimensionality in mathematics.
MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372
So I had a discussion with my brother about this (it was sort of a joke, but I am a mathematician and every joke I turn into a theorem and vice versa... :-)), it was kinda of short.

But if we already have dimensions which aren't whole integer numbers (he didn't know that, and didn't seem interested about it) couldn't we define negative dimensions?

I sort of trying to visualise such a thing, not sure what to define here. obviously this notion should generalize Hausdorff dimension definition.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hey MathematicalPhysicist.

One thing I think you should realize is that anything negative is just something that is relative to something else.

A negative number is relative to an origin just like an angle (or its cosine) is relative in terms of orientation.e

We also have integrals and other measures that are relative and for this we call these "signed" measures which are apparent in areas, volumes, determinants, and other measures.

So in the same spirit, you could define a negative dimension is something that has some form of relativity to something else in that it has less dimension, information, or something else that maintains its meaning but capture the spirit of this relative reference.

All negative things must have this form of relativity and I don't think that its not possible to allow dimension to extend to this in the way that we do to determinants, areas, volumes, and numbers.
 
MathematicalPhysicist said:
So I had a discussion with my brother about this (it was sort of a joke, but I am a mathematician and every joke I turn into a theorem and vice versa... :-)), it was kinda of short.

But if we already have dimensions which aren't whole integer numbers (he didn't know that, and didn't seem interested about it) couldn't we define negative dimensions?

I sort of trying to visualise such a thing, not sure what to define here. obviously this notion should generalize Hausdorff dimension definition.

You should probably read this article: http://users.math.yale.edu/mandelbrot/web_pdfs/123negativeFractalDimensions.pdf .

If a single point has dimension zero, then the only way for a set of points to have negative dimension is that the set has to be empty. Apparently sets can be empty to different degrees.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...

Similar threads

Back
Top