What Are Other Types of Proportion Beyond Direct and Inverse?

  • Thread starter Thread starter _Muddy_
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores types of proportion beyond direct and inverse, focusing on the concept of proportionality constants, such as "k." It explains that "k" represents a constant in equations, indicating that proportional relationships do not imply a one-to-one ratio. The conversation highlights that the choice of variable names is arbitrary, and consistency in notation is crucial. Additionally, it mentions that other forms of proportion exist, such as those found in physics, where relationships can involve inverse squares. Understanding these concepts broadens the comprehension of proportional relationships in various contexts.
_Muddy_
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
hello

we have been covering direct and inverse proportion at school. Are there any other types of proprtion?

We've been coming across questions like:

x is directly proportion to Y

Then I've been told to write

X (the proportion sign, which is like 8 on its side) Y

X=ky

We are then given a value for x and a value for y and asked to work out k. I'm fine with that but I'm wondering why we have to put "k"? Why does that proportion sign turn into "K"?

Also i was looking at the friedmann equation and i saw it had a "k" in it. When i see a physics equation like that will the K usually mean "constant" and will it have something to do with proportion?

thanks _Muddy_
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Any proportionality constant, if consistantly applied in the situation can be used; whether k, or c, or R, or K, or C, or anything which you can accept as a constant. Just understand that case-level really matters, so that k is a different number than K. x is a different number than X. Be consistant with your use of variables.
 
In case it helps, direct variation means that the RATIO between two numbers is a constant. When you express that x=ky, and that k is the proportionality constant, then we equivalently mean x/y is a constant, and that this constant is k.
 
k is just a constant (it is a number). The fact that you use k is entirely arbitrary, you could have used a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,a happy face, the peace sign whatever (although usually it is convention to use the beginning of the alphabet (a,b,c) to represent constants and the end to represent variables (x,y,z). The reason the proportional sign turn into a constant is because when you say something is PROPORTIONAL it doesn't mean 1 to 1 (i.e. if I have one person standing in a room I have (assuming they are properly attired) 2 shoes in the room (they have one on each foot). If another person enters the room you then have FOUR shoes. Therefore, the number of shoes in the room is PROPORTIONAL to the number of people but it is in fact TWICE the number of people therefore (# of people) time 2 = # of shoes. So in that case the porportionality 'constant' is 2. What if I considered limbs (2 arms, 2 legs) then, for each person in the room I have 4 times as many limbs so the proportionality constant is 4. And so on.

And yes there are more then just direct and inverse. For example, in physics the force that two charged particles feel towards each other is proportional to the inverse of the SQUARE of their distances (i.e. Force is proportional to 1/(distance)^2 so it's F = c/(distance)^2 where c is just a constant)
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top