What Are Recommended Calculus Books for Self-Study?

Ben09
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm a college student needing to take calculus 2 this fall. However, I have not taken calc 1, so since I'm good at teaching myself I'm planning on giving myself a crash course in the material covered in calc 1 over this summer. Can anyone recommend a good calculus book for someone who's fairly good at math but has limited experience with calc? Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hm.. It's going to be pretty hard for you to excel in calc II without taking calc I, frankly, I'm not sure how you even got enrolled into a calc II class without having calc I under your belt, but it's not my business.

There's a book called the calculus life saver, which may be of interest to you. Hope this helps.
 
PROTIP:
Rules for differentiation:
  1. derivative of a constant
    In general, if f(.) does not depend explicitly on some variable, say x it's derivative is zero:
    <br /> \frac{d}{d x}\left(C\right) = 0<br />
  2. derivative with respect to the argument:
    <br /> \frac{d x}{d x} = 1<br />
  3. rule of sums
    <br /> \frac{d}{d x}\left[ f(x) + g(x) \right] = \frac{d f(x)}{dx} + \frac{d g(x)}{dx}<br />
  4. product tule
    <br /> \frac{d}{d x}\left[ f(x) \cdot g(x) \right] = \frac{d f(x)}{dx} \cdot g(x) + f(x) \cdot \frac{d g(x)}{dx}<br />
  5. chain rule
    <br /> \frac{d}{d x} \left( f[g(x)] \right) = \left. \frac{d f(u)}{du} \right|_{u = g(x)} \cdot \frac{d g(x)}{d x}<br />
  6. derivative of the exponential function
    <br /> \frac{d \exp(x)}{dx} = \exp(x)<br />

Using the above, see if you can derive the following:
  1. Quotient rule
    <br /> \frac{d}{d x}\left( \frac{f(x)}{g(x)}\right) = \frac{f&#039;(x) \, g(x) - f(x) \, g&#039;(x)}{[g(x)]^{2}}<br />
  2. Derivative of a power function:
    <br /> \frac{d}{d x}\left( x^{\alpha} \right) = \alpha \, x^{\alpha - 1}, \ \alpha \in \mathbf{R}<br />
  3. Derivative of an inverse function
    <br /> y = f(x) \Rightarrow x = f^{-1}(y)<br />

    <br /> f[f^{-1}(x)] = x<br />

    <br /> \frac{d}{d x}\left( f^{-1}(x) \right) = \frac{1}{f&#039;[f^{-1}(x)]}<br />
  4. Derivative of a logarithm
    <br /> (\log_{a} {x})&#039; = \frac{1}{x \, \ln{a}}<br />
  5. Derivative of trigonometric functions
    Using Euler's identity:
    <br /> e^{\textup{i} \, x} = \cos{x} + \textup{i} \, \sin{x}<br />

    and taking the real and imaginary part of the derivative, prove:
    <br /> \begin{array}{l}<br /> (\cos{x})&#039; = -\sin{x} \\<br /> <br /> (\sin{x})&#039; = \cos{x}<br /> \end{array}<br />
  6. Find the derivative of
    <br /> x^{x}<br />
 
Last edited:
Shouldn't you include the definition of a derivative before introducing the rules for it? Just a thought...

\frac{d f\left(x\right)}{dx}= \text{lim}_{h\rightarrow0} \frac{f\left(x+h\right)-f\left(x\right)}{h}

To solve it, you first have to eliminate h from the denominator.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
6K
Replies
38
Views
5K
Replies
22
Views
6K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top