What are some possible questions for an Oral Exam in Electromagnetic Hi?

abotiz
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I am having an Oral Exam tomorrow, and the only clue about what's coming is this:

Being able to describe in an adequate way a solution to everyday electromagnetic issues.

I thought I should prepare my self a little bit, so I wanted to ask someone here about what kind of things that could possibly show up.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
abotiz said:
Hi!

I am having an Oral Exam tomorrow, and the only clue about what's coming is this:

Being able to describe in an adequate way a solution to everyday electromagnetic issues.

I thought I should prepare my self a little bit, so I wanted to ask someone here about what kind of things that could possibly show up.

Thanks!

That's a broad area. There is not much you can do before tomorrow. Just know Maxwell's equations by heart and apply them to the given question. Knowing the equations is important, knowing what they mean is even more important. And, being able to apply them to a relevant problem correctly will be a A grade in anyone's book. Just keep calm, make sure you clearly understand the question and slowly talk your way through the problem. The answer may come to you, but even if it doesn't you can still score decent marks. Just stay calm, think slowly, think clearly, breath deeply and do your best. Good luck.
 
Thanks! If you think of any possible question let me know :)

Perhaps I will write here tomorrow and tell how it went , if I don't write anything I probably failed.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top