What are some tips for getting involved in undergraduate research in physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter exohuman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Direction
AI Thread Summary
Transitioning from electrical engineering to physics is driven by a passion for the subject, with a desire to engage in undergraduate research for both enjoyment and graduate school preparation. Concerns arise about the difficulty of securing research opportunities at a large public university, especially when advisors downplay their importance. The individual expresses frustration with their grasp of introductory physics concepts, questioning their readiness for advanced studies. Confidence in physics may improve with further coursework, as foundational knowledge is solidified through experience. Ultimately, dedication to studying and a genuine love for physics are essential for success in the field.
exohuman
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I am switching from the practical and career based path of EE to physics because I really love physics and astronomy and think it would be great to go and get a PhD whether or not I end up pursuing any sort of academic research. I realize how hard it is to go that path.

But my EE research advisors were pretty down on that career path. I really want to get involved in undergrad research not only because I need to for grad school but because I find it much more fun than just taking classes. However, going to a large public university I don't know how easy or difficult that will be. I personally kind of feel that undergrad research should just part of the program because you don't learn to do science by just taking courses. The fact I already had a position in an EE lab is great but I am really pretty sure EE stuff doesn't interest me very much.

However, when I talked to advisors about research they kind of brush it off as "maybe later" and don't really want to talk about it or don't see it as important. I meeting with some new advisors in a few weeks but I don't know how that would differ. Essentially I am unsure if I want to go into Physics unless I can definitely get involved in some research on campus. I'd try for REU's by my shoddy academic past and bland demographics probably make that a very very long shot.

Combine that with the fact that I decided to review Intro Physics material to get ready for next semester and just in general feel horrible about how much I forgot and how a simple conceptual question could trip me up.. I feel like I get better at things as they become more abstract and for some reason I kind of suck at Intro Mechanics, or at least I feel like it should come to me much easier than it does. Like if I went back to Calc I level book it would be trivially easy. What does this mean about me and my prospects in high level physics?

I really wish I had some real people to talk about but I have found the senior people on here to get some really amazing advice at time so I am hoping for some of that I guess.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
exohuman said:
However, going to a large public university I don't know how easy or difficult that will be.

Only one way to find out...

However, when I talked to advisors about research they kind of brush it off as "maybe later" and don't really want to talk about it or don't see it as important.

Sounds like you are talking to the wrong advisors. I never had anyone brush off the importance of research in one's physics career at any level.

What does this mean about me and my prospects in high level physics?

It means you'll have to study, perhaps a bit harder than the rest. If you "love" physics, it shouldn't be too much of a chore.
 
Getting research can be very difficult.
 
fss said:
It means you'll have to study, perhaps a bit harder than the rest. If you "love" physics, it shouldn't be too much of a chore.

Could I be doing something wrong? Do people more advanced get tripped up on easy stuff? Or is there some sort of flaw in how I learned it? I mean I can successfully do most of the "challenge" problems from the book I am using but some times I really feel bad about myself when it takes me like 10-20 minutes to do a problem I feel like I should know cold? And a few of the challenge problems here and there I haven't been able to complete on my own.

Like I said if I went back to first semester Calculus to review I feel like I'd feel much stronger on that material. Is that sort of math just inherently easier? Could it be that I haven't had to use physics in many of my other classes while Calculus is key in almost everything I've taken since?

So far I've only taken Physics I & II and we be refreshing my knowledge over the next few months. After taking a few more semesters of advanced physics classes will I start to get that confidence I have in math in Physics? I feel like the way Intro Physics is taught is sort of broken. I'm taking Modern Physics next semester and hope I that will sure up my Knowledge of intro stuff and introduce me a bit more to what the pace and tone of real physics courses are.
 
Anyone?
 
exohuman said:
So far I've only taken Physics I & II

Then the 'maybe later' advice is probably sound. You can't really start research when you're still at the very start of your knowledge. I also wouldn't decide what your major is based on whether or not you can 'definitely get undergraduate research'. It's potentially a life-long career changer, don't base it on something so small.

exohuman said:
After taking a few more semesters of advanced physics classes will I start to get that confidence I have in math in Physics?

Well, hopefully. I don't know how you expect anyone to actually give an answer to this. Work hard and hopefully you'll gain a good understanding. If you do, then hopefully you'll also gain confidence.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
82
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
418
Replies
4
Views
978
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top