What Are the Benefits and Risks of Tritium?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gerenuk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tritium
AI Thread Summary
Tritium is a radioactive isotope that decays through beta decay, emitting low-energy electrons that are typically contained within vials, such as those used in glow sticks and watches. The energy from tritium's decay is converted into visible light, making it useful for luminescent applications. Concerns about its safety focus on the amount of tritium present and its comparison to natural radioactivity levels, with some users questioning the longevity and efficiency of tritium's luminescence over time. Tritium has a half-life of about 12.5 years, leading to discussions about its effectiveness after several years of use. Overall, while tritium is considered safe in contained applications, its long-term viability and safety compared to natural radiation sources remain points of interest.
Gerenuk
Messages
1,027
Reaction score
5
Is this real tritium in there? Is tritium expensive? Is it radioactive? How does it compare to natural sources of radioactivity?

http://www.time4tritium.com/benefits.cfm
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It won't be surprising if it was real tritium, it is used in such applications. You can buy small tritium powered glow sticks on eBay.

Yes, it is radioactive, it decays by beta decay, emitting an electron. From what I remember energy of the electron is too low to get outside of the vial or (in this case) clock, it is stopped by thin paper.

Edit - that's what I meant:

http://thecoolgadgets.com/nite-glowring-tritium-glow-ring/
 
Oh, thanks for the technology update :)

And there is no chance that the beta radiation will ionize something which itself will emit radiation which can leave the vial?

And what about the Bremsstrahlung?
 
I'd like to see comparison pictures of the vials when they are 10 years old. I know they say that they are good for a quarter of a century but tritium's half-live is like 12.5 years or so. On my Speedmaster, after 12 years, the tritium is worthless. I would imagine they would really have to pack in the tritium or have found a much more efficient means of luminescing.
 
Gerenuk said:
And there is no chance that the beta radiation will ionize something which itself will emit radiation which can leave the vial?

Actually - that's how it works. Energy from the beta radiation is converted to light which leaves the vial.

I suppose your main question/concern here is how safe these things are and how does the amount of energy they can emit compare to that from natural sources. No idea. First thing to check would be to find out how much tritium each vial contains.

Electron from the decay has energy in the keV range, that is converted to visible light - eV range. One decaying atom gives enough energy to emit thousands of visible light photons (probably much less in reality), so even such a single event should be easily visible and several per sec could give the impression of continuous light.

But I am just guessing here.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top