What are the best transceiver options for low data loss during transmission?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ws0619
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Data Loss
AI Thread Summary
Transceiver data loss during transmission is not solely dependent on data rate; interference can cause more data loss in faster links during brief disruptions. For a project involving wireless transmission of sensor data over 300 meters, the choice of transceiver is crucial. Options like 433.92 MHz modules are recommended for their affordability and legality in certain regions. If the user has experience with electronics, integrating a Picaxe chip can simplify data collection with its built-in A to D conversion capabilities. Overall, selecting the right transceiver and understanding the project requirements are key to minimizing data loss.
ws0619
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Hi! Recently I done some survey on transceiver, may I know if a transceiver which data rate is 1.2kbps and a transceiver with data rate 19kbps, which transceiver will loss more data during transmit?
Can anyone recommend me a suitable transceiver?(data rate high, loss of data low)
thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The loss rate shouldn't depend on the data rate
If there is some noise which causes a loss of connection then for a given time the faster link will lose more data, ie. if the interference lasts for 0.1sec then one link will lose 120bits while the other will lose 1900bits.
On the other hand if you need to transmit a certain amount of data then the faster link will allow you to send it more often or to send more error correction bits.
 
Neither will lose any data if the transmission path is loss free.

Handshaking is usually included and this keeps checking to see if the transmission was received OK. This is done with checksums.

If there are losses, the transmission is sent again. Doing this slows the process down, but unless conditions are very bad, the faster system should still work out faster than the slow one, especially if the faster one is 16 times as fast as the slow one as in your example.

Can't suggest any transceivers as you haven't explained what you want to do. Probably couldn't anyway.
 
thanks a lot! What I want to do is to transmit data from sensors such as pressure,temperature by wireless transceiver to my computer, and the distance between my computer and those sensors more than 300m.
 
It matters how much of the project you can do yourself.
If you are not too familiar with electronics and sensor interfacing, A to D converters and computer programming, you may have to look for a commercial data logger module.

If you have experience with these things, there are 433.92 MHz transmit / receive modules which are quite legal in some countries and are available cheaply. These could provide the data radio link.
http://jaycar.com.au/products_uploaded/ZW3102(mod).pdf
http://jaycar.com.au/products_uploaded/ZW3100(mod).pdf
Please have a look at these files as well as the main site :
http://jaycar.com.au

Actually collecting the data would be easy with a Picaxe chip.
I suggest you Google this. These cpu chips that have precision A to D converter inputs and Ascii outputs. Ideal for your job.

Here is some more info about Picaxe chips :
http://www.picaxe.orconhosting.net.nz/
This is fun stuff to do.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top