What Are the Coefficients in Aluffi's Monoid Rings?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Rings
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the coefficients in monoid rings as described in Paolo Aluffi's book, "Algebra: Chapter 0." Specifically, the confusion arises from the notation used in Chapter III, Section 1.4, where the coefficients are referred to as $$r_m$$ instead of the expected $$a_m$$. Participants confirm that this is indeed a typographical error, and the correct notation should consistently use $$a_m$$ as the formal elements of the ring $$R$$.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of monoids and their properties
  • Familiarity with ring theory and formal linear combinations
  • Knowledge of algebraic notation and terminology
  • Basic comprehension of Paolo Aluffi's "Algebra: Chapter 0"
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the definition and properties of monoid rings in algebra
  • Study the implications of typographical errors in mathematical texts
  • Explore formal linear combinations and their applications in ring theory
  • Read further sections of Aluffi's "Algebra: Chapter 0" for deeper insights
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebra students, and educators seeking clarity on monoid rings and the importance of precise notation in mathematical literature.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Paolo Aluffi's book, Algebra: Chapter 0.

I have a question related to Aluffi's description of monoid rings ... ...

In Chapter III, Section 1.4 on monoid rings, we read the following:View attachment 4476
View attachment 4477

In the above text we find:"Given a monoid $$(M, \cdot )$$ and a ring $$R$$, we can obtain a new ring $$R[M]$$ as follows.Elements of $$R[M]$$ are formal linear combinations

$$\sum_{ m \in M} a_m \cdot m $$

where the 'coefficients' $$r_m$$ are formal elements of $$R$$ and $$a_m \ne 0$$ for at most finitely many summands ... ... "
My question is as follows:What are the $$r_m$$ exactly and what is their relation to the a_m ... ?Is it a typo ... that is does Aluffi mean .." ... ... where the 'coefficients' $$a_m$$ are formal elements of $$R$$ ... " ... that is ... does he mean $$a_m$$ where he writes $$r_m$$?Hope someone can clarify this issue for me ... ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Peter,

I'm pretty sure that it's a typo, read it as $a_{m}$.
 
Fallen Angel said:
Hi Peter,

I'm pretty sure that it's a typo, read it as $a_{m}$.
Thanks Fallen Angel ... certainly thought it might be ... but was not completely confident that I was not missing something ...

Thanks again,

Peter
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
976
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K