What are the common fates of photons in matter?

  • Thread starter Thread starter snorkack
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photons
snorkack
Messages
2,388
Reaction score
536
Main fate of low energy photons in matter is photoelectric effect.

At intermediate energies, it is Compton scattering (presumably mainly off electrons).

At high energies, it is said to be "pair production".

Pairs of what?

At low energies, mainly electrons and positrons, obviously (neutrino pair production can be expected to have low intensity).

But at higher energies?

Is photonuclear effect a significant fate of photons compared to pair production, which remains possible at these energies?

When the photon has sufficient energy, what is the branching ratio between p(γ,e+e-)p and p(γ,μ+μ-)p?
And is a "pair" needed if it is bosons that are generated? For example, do conservation laws allow p(γ,π°)p? Or p(γ,π+)n?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When the photon has sufficient energy, what is the branching ratio between p(γ,e+e-)p and p(γ,μ+μ-)p?
Well, you can almost figure out the answer to this on a Post-It, just from dimensionality considerations. The cross-section for pair-production by a photon scattering off a nucleus is calculated to be σ(ω) = αZ2r02F(η) where α = e2/ħc is the fine structure constant, m is the mass of the electron, r0 = e2/mc2 is the classical electron radius, η is a dimensionless energy variable, η = ħω/mc2, and F(η) is a horrible function. Naturally F(η) goes to zero at threshhold, ħω = 2 mc2, or η = 2.That's pretty complicated, but wait -- what else could it be? σ must have dimensions of area, and the only length available is r0. So σ must go like 1/m2. For muon pair production at a corresponding energy, it's 1/(200)2 smaller.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top