What are the Convolution Intervals for Step Function and Exponential Decay?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the convolution of a step function, represented as x[n] = u[n], and an exponential decay function, h[n] = a^(-n)u[-n], where 0 < a < 1. The convolution result y[n] is derived using the summation formula y[n] = Σ h[k]x[n-k] for all k. The key intervals for the summation are established as n <= 0 and n > 0, leading to the results Σ a^k for n <= 0 and Σ a^k for n > 0, with specific conditions on k that dictate the limits of the summation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of convolution in discrete-time signals
  • Familiarity with unit step functions (u[n])
  • Knowledge of exponential decay functions
  • Basic summation techniques in signal processing
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of convolution in discrete-time systems
  • Learn about the unit step function and its applications in signal processing
  • Explore the implications of exponential decay in system responses
  • Investigate the derivation of convolution intervals in more complex scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in signal processing, electrical engineering, and applied mathematics who are looking to deepen their understanding of convolution operations and their applications in analyzing discrete-time systems.

MalB
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am trying to see if I understand the convolution process correctly.
This is from the solved example of my prof's notes:

x[n] = u[n]
and h[n] = a-nu[-n] for 0<a<1

As expected the first step was

y[n] = x[n]* h[n]

= Ʃ h[k]x[n-k] -∞<k<∞
= Ʃ a-ku[-k]u[n-k] -∞<k<∞

From my understanding u[-k] = 0 for all k > 0 so that would give us the upper limit of k to be 0
And we would also need for n-k > 0 and when we have those conditions we would just then be left with the summation of a^-k since the other 2 would always evaluate to 1 in that interval.

But for the solution the cases considered were when n <= 0 and when n >0 and then the answers were

Ʃ ak -n<k<∞ for the first case (n<=0)
and Ʃak 0<k<∞

I don't understand how they came to those intervals. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I think i have it figured out.
I will post my understanding and then maybe someone can comment on whether I was right.
My idea of k<0 was right but only if n > 0 which would make the second term u[n-k] always positive also giving us a SUM a^-k and then we flip the summation around cause we change the sign and end up with the answer noted for n>0

for n<0 for n-k >= 0 we need -k >= n or k<= -n
and then we end up with SUM a^-k and then again flip the limits and end up with the answer noted for n<0
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K