What are the correct labels for the variables in the bar chart?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on correctly labeling variables in a bar chart, with the user needing assistance in identifying which of their proposed labels are incorrect. They mention having six potential labels but are unsure which three should be left empty. A participant suggests that the independent variable is typically represented on the y-axis, implying that the user's sixth entry may be misplaced. The conversation highlights the challenge of explaining variable placement without directly providing answers. Accurate labeling is crucial for clear data representation in the chart.
Orion78
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
I need to drag and drop all the labels into the relevant boxes by the bar chart. Three spaces will be left empty because there is anything to describe them. (See the attachment)
I was thinking:

title
empty
empty
smalles difference between ...
empty
independent variable
dependent variable
longest mean ...

Only six of those answers are right but I cannot decide which one are wrong. Can anyone could give me any hints? Thanks
 

Attachments

  • question.png
    question.png
    17.2 KB · Views: 423
Physics news on Phys.org
Your independent variables are normally the y-axis, that could be the one you have wrong, should not be your 6th entry... Know I can't just give the answer, but it is difficult to explain it any other way, haha...
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Similar threads

Work-energy v.s. impulse-momentum bar charts
Replies
9
Views
2K
Python What's wrong with this Python program on Euler's forward algorithm?
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Determining functional relation of two dependant variables
Replies
1
Views
1K
A Keeping Randomized Variable in Regression?
Replies
2
Views
1K
What does "limit of zero pressure" mean for ideal gas temperature?
Replies
14
Views
3K
MHB Levels of Measurement, Basic OLS Regression Questions
Replies
1
Views
2K
How many variables to describe a system?
Replies
10
Views
2K
Time to empty gas cylinder (problem worked, but would like feedback)
Replies
7
Views
3K
Random Variable Measurability w.r.t. Sigma Fields
Replies
16
Views
6K
How to Build a Supercapacitor Dragster on a Budget?
Replies
3
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top