What are the differences between regimes I and II in drag forces?

AI Thread Summary
Regimes I and II in drag forces relate to different flow conditions characterized by Reynolds numbers. Regime I, associated with low Reynolds numbers, is governed by Stokes' law, where drag is proportional to velocity. In contrast, Regime II applies to high Reynolds numbers, where drag increases with the square of velocity, typical in turbulent flow. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding these regimes in the context of laminar versus turbulent flow. Additional resources, such as Wikipedia, provide further clarification on these concepts.
wrongusername
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
So I was looking at MIT iTunes U physics videos, and the professor talked about regimes I and II in the video about drag forces. I think regime I has to do with the temperature of the medium and regime II has to do with the density. But, I cannot find that information in my 1st semester physics textbook. Nor can I find such info using Google (perhaps I'm using the wrong search terms?:rolleyes:). Can anybody provide me with links to websites containing such stuff in them?
Thank you very much! :D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've never heard of this terminology before. It sounds very odd... I'd need to see the context of how they are using these words.
 
There is the laminar flow regime vs. the turbulent regime. There is also the subsonic flow regime vs. supersonic. You should be able to tell which two are being distinguished from the context.
 
Phrak said:
There is the laminar flow regime vs. the turbulent regime. There is also the subsonic flow regime vs. supersonic. You should be able to tell which two are being distinguished from the context.

Ok, thanks for the info! :smile:
 
Both regimes are discussed here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drag_(physics )
Low Reynolds number drag is also called Stokes law. High Reynolds number drag (Re > 1000) corresponds to a force that is proportional to square of velocity, like an automobile at highway speeds.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top