What are the different types of superconductors and how do they work?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ARou
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Superconductors
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the two primary types of superconductors: conventional and non-conventional. Conventional superconductors are explained by BCS theory, which describes how electron pairing occurs due to bending fields from their movement. In contrast, non-conventional superconductors, particularly high-temperature type II superconductors, lack a comprehensive theoretical framework, with models like Ginzburg–Landau theory only partially predicting their behavior. The consensus is that the mechanisms behind high-temperature superconductors remain largely unexplained.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of BCS theory in superconductivity
  • Familiarity with Ginzburg–Landau theory
  • Knowledge of type I and type II superconductors
  • Basic principles of electron pairing and quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanisms of high-temperature superconductors
  • Explore advanced models of non-conventional superconductivity
  • Study the implications of Ginzburg–Landau theory on superconductivity
  • Investigate current experimental approaches to understanding superconductors
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, materials scientists, and researchers interested in superconductivity and its applications, particularly those focusing on high-temperature superconductors and theoretical models.

ARou
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
As I understand it there are two types of superconductors, conventional and non-conventional. Conventional superconductors are explained by the BCS theory, my understanding of which being electrons pair up because the bending fields from their movement hold them together and there is not enough other movement to break these forces, but non-conventional ones are not. How do the non-conventional superconductors work then?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Short version, nobody knows. There are several models. None of them explain high temperature type II superconductors.
 


I thought Ginzburg–Landau theory somewhat predicted observed features of type I and type II?
 


I think that the OP is asking about conventional versus e.g. high-temperature oxide superconductors.
 


Feldoh said:
I thought Ginzburg–Landau theory somewhat predicted observed features of type I and type II?
There are several models that explain this and that. There just isn't one that explains everything, even qualitatively, and gives a prediction for Tc that's anywhere close to the Tc of high-temperature superconductors, which really means that we don't understand what's going on with these.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K