What Are the Easiest Methods to Solve nPr=60 for n When r=3?

AI Thread Summary
To solve the equation nPr = 60 with r = 3, the equation simplifies to n(n-1)(n-2) = 60. Various methods can be employed, including using a calculator for a quick solution, applying the permutation formula, or creating a table to visualize combinations. The most straightforward method may depend on individual preferences and familiarity with the techniques. Ultimately, the solution yields n = 5, which satisfies the equation. Practicing different approaches can enhance understanding and efficiency in solving permutation problems.
zenity
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Was just wondering if there was a "shorter" method of solving this problem.

nPr = 60.

nPr = n!/(n-r)!

n=?
r=3

Works out to be

n(n-1)(n-2) = 60.

From here on, what different options do I have? I have several ways of solving it, but was wondering what would be the "easiest" method.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
since n is integer, find all the factors of 60, which are 2,3,4,5 and see which 3 consecutive numbers satisfy n(n-1)(n-2)=60
 


There are a few different approaches you could take to solve this problem, but the "easiest" method may vary depending on personal preference and comfort with different techniques. Here are a few possible options:

1. Use a calculator or online tool: If you have access to a calculator or an online permutation calculator, you can simply plug in the values of n and r and it will give you the answer (in this case, n=5). This may be the quickest and most straightforward method for some people.

2. Use a formula or equation: As you mentioned, the formula for permutations is nPr = n!/(n-r)!. You can rearrange this to solve for n by multiplying both sides by (n-r)! and then dividing by nPr. In this case, it would look like n = nPr * (n-r)!/r!. This method may take a little bit longer but can be useful if you don't have access to a calculator or if the numbers are more complex.

3. Use a table or chart: Another way to solve permutations is by creating a table or chart to list out all the possible combinations. For this problem, you could list out all the numbers from 1 to 5 and then find all the combinations of 3 numbers from that list. This method may take a bit more time and effort, but it can be helpful for visual learners or those who prefer a hands-on approach.

Ultimately, the "easiest" method may depend on your personal preference and comfort level with different techniques. It's always a good idea to try out a few different methods and see which one works best for you. Keep in mind that practice and familiarity with permutations will also make the process easier over time.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top