What are the effects of Hawking radiation on black holes?

AI Thread Summary
Hawking radiation is thermal radiation emitted by black holes due to quantum effects, where virtual particle pairs near the event horizon can become separated, allowing one particle to escape and the other to be absorbed, leading to a decrease in the black hole's mass. The Unruh effect indicates that an accelerating observer near the event horizon perceives this radiation as a thermal bath. The temperature of Hawking radiation for a static black hole is determined by its surface gravity, with equations provided for both static and rotating black holes. The evaporation time of a black hole is influenced by its mass, with smaller black holes evaporating more quickly, especially in the presence of cosmic microwave background radiation. Overall, factors like spin and charge can reduce the rate of Hawking radiation emitted by black holes.
Messages
19,773
Reaction score
10,726
Definition/Summary

Hawking radiation is black body thermal radiation predicted to be emitted by black holes due to quantum effects-

'The vacuum in quantum field theory is not really empty; it's filled with "virtual pairs" of particles and antiparticles that pop in and out of existence, with lifetimes determined by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. When such pairs forms near the event horizon of a black hole, though, they are pulled apart by the tidal forces of gravity. Sometimes one member of a pair crosses the horizon, and can no longer recombine with its partner. The partner can then escape to infinity, and since it carries off positive energy, the energy (and thus the mass) of the black hole must decrease.'
Source- Steve Carlip

Equations

Close to the event horizon of a black hole, a local observer must accelerate to keep from falling in. This implies that the Unruh effect (the prediction that an accelerating observer will observe black-body radiation where an inertial observer would observe none) takes place near the event horizon. An accelerating observer would see a thermal bath of particles pop out of the local acceleration horizon, turn around, and free-fall back in. Some of the particles emitted by the horizon are not reabsorbed and in the case of a BH, become outgoing Hawking radiation.

The equation for Unruh temperature as observed by an accelerating observer is-

T=\frac{a \hbar}{2\pi k_B c}

where a is the local acceleration, \hbar is the reduced Planck constant, k_B is the Boltzmann constant and c is the speed of light.

For a black hole, acceleration is replaced by surface gravity (\kappa). Black-body radiation for a static black hole-

T_H=\frac{\kappa \hbar}{2\pi k_B c}

for a static BH-

\kappa=\frac{c^4}{4Gm}

where G is the gravitational constant and m is mass. T_H can be rewritten-

T_H=\frac{\hbar c^3}{8\pi G k_Bm}


The power emitted by a static BH, according to the Stefan-Boltzmann-Schwarzschild-Hawking power law-

P=A\epsilon \sigma T^4

where A is surface area of the BH, \epsilon is emissivity (for a true black body, \epsilon = 1), \sigma is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant and T is temperature.

for a static black hole-

A=4\pi r_s^2=\frac{16 \pi G^2 m^2}{c^4}

where r_s is the Schwarzschild radius. P can be rewritten -

P=\frac{\hbar c^6}{15360 \pi G^2 m^2}

where P is the energy output in watts.


Evaporation time via Hawking radiation for a static BH-

t_{ev}=\frac{5120 \pi G^2 m^3}{\hbar c^4}

where t_{ev} is the evaporation time of the BH in seconds based on an empty universe (i.e. no matter, photons, CMB radiation or any other type of energy falling into the BH). For derivation, see Hr (wiki) link in 'See Also'.

'..since the universe contains the cosmic microwave background radiation, in order for a black hole to dissipate, it must have a temperature greater than that of the present-day black-body radiation of the universe of 2.7 K = 2.3e-4 eV. This implies that m must be less than 0.8% of the mass of the Earth.' The smaller the BH, the quicker it evaporates.

Extended explanation

For a rotating BH, the equation for TH can be rewritten-

T_H=\frac{\hbar\kappa}{2\pi k_B c}=2\left(1+\frac{M}{\sqrt{M^2-a^2}}\right)^{-1} \frac{\hbar c^3}{8\pi Gk_bm}&lt;\frac{\hbar c^3}{8\pi Gk_bm}<br />

where M is the gravitational radius (M=Gm/c2) and a is the spin parameter (a=J/mc)

For a charged BH, the equation can be rewritten as-

T_H=\frac{\hbar\kappa}{2\pi k_B c}=\left(1-\frac{Q^4}{r_+^4}\right)^{-1} \frac{\hbar c^3}{8\pi Gk_bm}&lt;\frac{\hbar c^3}{8\pi Gk_bm}<br />

where Q is charge and r+ is the outer event horizon.

The above implies that spin and charge reduce Hawking radiation though a/M or Q/M would have to virtually equal 1 for HR to be significantly reduced.

If both spin and charge are present then-

\kappa=c^2\ \frac{(r_+-r_-)}{2\left(r_+^2+a^2\right)}

where r_{\pm}=M \pm \sqrt(M^2-Q^2-a^2) and a^2+Q^2\leq M^2 applies.

* This entry is from our old Library feature. If you know who wrote it, please let us know so we can attribute a writer. Thanks!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Thanks for the overview of the Hawking Radiation!
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top