Chemistry What are the empirical and molecular formulas of the compound

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the empirical and molecular formulas of a compound composed of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen, based on combustion data. The combustion of 10.68 mg of the compound produces 16.01 mg of CO2 and 4.37 mg of H2O, leading to calculations of moles of carbon and hydrogen. The empirical formula is derived by finding the grams of carbon and hydrogen from the combustion products, then calculating the grams of oxygen by subtracting from the total mass. The final empirical formula is C3H4O3, while the molecular formula is C6H8O6, determined by comparing the molecular weight to the empirical weight. The step-by-step approach emphasizes calculating moles and adjusting for whole numbers to arrive at the correct formulas.
Kingthi
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
"A compound contains only carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen. Combustion of 10.68 mg of the compound yields 16.01 mg CO2 and 4.37 mg H2O. The molar mass of the compound is 176.1 g/mol. What are the empirical and molecular formulas of the compound."

I saw an earlier post but it wasn't solved yet. There were some good explanations but can I get a step by step guide to solving this, i just can't seem to get it

I have started off by finding the moles of CO2 and H2O but after that step i cannot find the next step. The answer to the problems are C3H4O3 and C6H8O6
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You can work out how many moles of C and H are produced from the masses of the CO2 and H2O given, ignore the oxygen because you don't know how much came from the air.
You know how many moles of the substance there were so you can work out how many carbon and hydrogen it had.
You have the molecular mass so any difference between the amount of carbon and hydrogen you worked out must be oxygen.
 
1) find the grams of C from CO2, find the grams of H from H2O

2) Original amount - grams of (C + H) = Grams of O

3) find the moles of C from CO2, H from H2O, O from molar mass of O

4) CxHyOz ... divide by the smallest amount of moles and manipulate your findings till you have a whole number which gives you your Empirical Formula

5) MW/EW = some value = Multiply your EF by this value.
 
Last edited:
i just worked it ... it works, have you solved it yet?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
100
Views
12K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top