What Are the Energy Values and Probabilities for Two Particles in a 1D Box?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nemisis42
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Box Particles
nemisis42
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If there are 2 particles of mass m1 and m2 in a one dimensional box of width a, I'm trying to find 1)what values will be found if the energy is measured, and with what probability these values will take occur. and 2) what is the probability of finding particle 1 with mass m1 in the interval (0,a/2) (all of this is at time t=0) (the particles are not symmetric)The wave equation is:



Homework Equations



\Psi (X1,X2,0)=(3\Phi7(X1)*\Phi6(X2)+8\Phi3(X1)*\Phi2(X2))/(sqrt(73))




The Attempt at a Solution




I ended up with energy E=(((n7)^2/(m1))+((n6)^2/(m2)))*\hbar^2*\pi^2/(2*a^2)+(((n3)^2/(m1))+((n2)^2/(m2)))*\hbar^2*\pi^2/(2*a^2))

With (9/73) chance for E7,6 and (64/73) chance for E3,2

Would anybody be able to tell me if what I have looks correct(and point me in the right direction if its not) and tell me where to start with the probability of finding particle 1 in the interval (0,a/2). I did change the values from the original equation. I'm really just interested in the principal behind this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nemisis42 said:
I ended up with energy E=(((n7)^2/(m1))+((n6)^2/(m2)))*\hbar^2*\pi^2/(2*a^2)+(((n3)^2/(m1))+((n2)^2/(m2)))*\hbar^2*\pi^2/(2*a^2))

With (9/73) chance for E7,6 and (64/73) chance for E3,2
Your probabilities are correct, but what exactly is your expression above for E supposed to represent? Your E is a single number, but you have two probabilities. And what are n7, n6, n3, and n2?
Would anybody be able to tell me if what I have looks correct(and point me in the right direction if its not) and tell me where to start with the probability of finding particle 1 in the interval (0,a/2). I did change the values from the original equation. I'm really just interested in the principal behind this.
The probability of finding particle 1 in the interval a ≤ x1 ≤ a+dx1 and particle 2 in interval b ≤ x2 ≤ b+dx2 is given by

P(a\le x_1 \le a+dx_1 , b\le x_2 \le b+dx_2) = \Psi^*(a,b)\Psi(a,b)\,dx_1\,dx_2

You need to integrate this function over the appropriate ranges to find the total probability.
 
vela said:
Your probabilities are correct, but what exactly is your expression above for E supposed to represent? Your E is a single number, but you have two probabilities. And what are n7, n6, n3, and n2?

The probability of finding particle 1 in the interval a ≤ x1 ≤ a+dx1 and particle 2 in interval b ≤ x2 ≤ b+dx2 is given by

P(a\le x_1 \le a+dx_1 , b\le x_2 \le b+dx_2) = \Psi^*(a,b)\Psi(a,b)\,dx_1\,dx_2

You need to integrate this function over the appropriate ranges to find the total probability.

Thanks alot. I assumed the probability for finding particle 1 was something like that, but for some reason whenever I came across that formula, it was written in weird notation. Sorry for the energy formula. I was just learning how to use the latex reference. Below is what I would have for E7,6 with n7=7 and so on. I was just curious if there was something else I could do to simplify it.


\frac{ n<sub>7</sub> <sup>2</sup> } { m<sub>1</sub> } + ( \frac{ n<sub>6</sub> <sup>2</sup> }{ m<sub>2</sub> })\frac{ \hbar <sup>2</sup> \pi <sup>2</sup> }{2 a<sup>2</sup>}


I apologize again. This is the best I could do for the energy formula for the energy formula for the first one. the second part is hbar squared multiplied by Pi squared divided by 2 mulitplied by a squared, the first part is n subscript 7(which is 7) squared divided by mass 1 plus n subscript 6 divided by mass 2. Sorry for the confusion.

(n72/m1+ n62/m2)( \hbar 2/(2a2)
 
Last edited:
Subscripts would typically used to indicate which particle a variable describes, not the value of the variable. You'd have n1=3 and n2=2 or n1=7 and n2=6.

I'm still not sure why you're summing the energies for the different states though.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.

Similar threads

Back
Top