What are the functions of Boyer-Linquist coordinates?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Moore1879
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coordinates
Moore1879
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hey,
I was wondering if someone could kindly explain to me everything they can about Boyer-linquist coordinates. I was looking at them and I think I saw something, but I'm not sure. So, someone please tell me everything about them.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's a rather vague question. Why do you Kerr about them?
 
pervect said:
That's a rather vague question. Why do you Kerr about them?

My, you are a low-down, punning KERR, I think I'll run over you with my KERR.

And no, I don't know how he pronounced it either.
 
Some possibly useful references:

Boyer, R. H. and Lindquist, R. W. "Maximal Analytic Extension of the Kerr Metric." J. Math. Phys. 8, 265-281, 1967.
http://link.aip.org/link/?jmp/8/265

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/RelWWW/history.html
http://www.eftaylor.com/pub/SpinNEW.pdf
http://monopole.ph.qmul.ac.uk/~bill/stg/stg_chapter_9.doc

http://members.tripod.com/~Albert51/bhole.htm
http://www.astro.ku.dk/~cramer/RelViz/text/geom_web/node4.html

http://www2.phys.canterbury.ac.nz/kerrfest/Carter.pdf
http://odarragh.astro.utoronto.ca/GR-II_presentations/Grunhut_GRII.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You guys do realize that Schwarzschild's solution also utilized the boyer-lindquist coordinates, right?
 
Moore1879 said:
You guys do realize that Schwarzschild's solution also utilized the boyer-lindquist coordinates, right?

Boyer-Lindquist coordinates (r,theta,phi,t) are a generalization of Schwarzschild coordinates (r,theta,phi,t) just as the Kerr solution is a generalization of the Schwarzschild solution.

See for instance
http://www.math.ucla.edu/~bon/kerr/intro2.html
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/KerrBlackHole.html

There are some auxillary variables used in the expression for the BL metric
\Delta, \rho, however these variables do not appear as differentials in the metric (dr^2, etc.) in the descriptions I've seen (those above plus MTW's Gravitation) so these variables wouldn't qualify as coordinates in my opinion.

I really don't know what information you are looking for, your questions have been a bit vague so far.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top