What are the independent terms in the Magnetic Tensor

AI Thread Summary
The magnetic gradient tensor consists of nine components organized in a 3x3 matrix, but only five of these components are independent. This independence means that the remaining four components can be derived from the five independent terms, often due to mathematical relationships or symmetries within the tensor. Understanding this concept can be challenging, particularly when visualizing how the rates of change of different magnetic field components relate to each other. The discussion highlights the difficulty in grasping how one component's change can influence another's, emphasizing the need for clarity on the underlying principles of tensor mathematics. Insights into these relationships can aid in better understanding the magnetic gradient tensor's structure and its implications in magnetic field analysis.
welshrich
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I am trying to understand the magnetic gradient tensor which has nine components. There are three magnetic field components, but there are also three baselines. These nine gradients are organised into a 3x3 matrix. I have read that only 5 of these terms are independent. What exactly does this mean? What makes them independent?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If five terms are independent than given those five terms you are able to calculate the others
 
Thanks that is helpful. I had been trying to visualise what is happening and not having much success - I can imagine splitting the magnetic vector into 3 components and then measuring the rate of change of each of these particular components in the three directions. I did not realize you can use some of the terms in the matrix to calculate others. I assumed that only 5 remained because the others somehow canceled each other due to symmetry. And this is where I am hitting a wall - I can't imagine how the rate of change of one component of the field with respect to a given baseline can be equal to the rate of change of another component of the field with respect to a particular baseline. Any insights?
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top