What Are the Key Experiments and Theorists Behind Nuclear Fusion?

AI Thread Summary
Key experiments and theorists in nuclear fusion include the contributions of Hans Bethe and Marcus Oliphant, who played significant roles in developing the theoretical framework. Relevant search terms for further research include "fusion," "discovery," and "Inertial Confinement Fusion," with resources like ITER providing valuable insights. For nuclear fission, notable figures include Lise Meitner, Otto Hahn, and Enrico Fermi. The discussion also highlights the importance of understanding both fusion and fission in the context of nuclear energy. Utilizing these search terms and resources will enhance the essay on nuclear fusion and fission.
Jia T
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For my essay on nuclear fission and fusion, I have to discuss some experimental evidence for nuclear fusion. I also need to find info about scientist that are responsible for developing the theory behind nuclear fusion. I am having trouble find info on these aspect.

Any help like relevant search terms for google would be appreciated.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try this :

http://www.ancient-rome.info/Nuclear_fusion#

ehild
 
One could look for "fusion","discovery".

Or look up the work of Hans Bethe and Marcus Oliphant, and many others.

For fission, look for "fission","discovery", or the works of Lise Meitner, Otto Hahn and Fritz Strassman, Enrico Fermi, Leo Szilard, . . . .
 
Try http://www.iter.org/" for Inertial Confinement Fusion. These are two forms of fusion research currently being conducted.

For Fision I suppose the obvious one is the bombs... Hiroshima ect ect.

If you need any more information on Inertial Confinment Fusion feel free to pm me as I am currently programming a computer simulation for it as part of my Masters Thesis :)

Joe
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks guys. Ill try some of the search terms and links.

Astronuc said:
One could look for "fusion","discovery".

I never thought of that.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top