What Are the Key Questions About Hyperspace Travel in Storytelling?

AI Thread Summary
Key questions about hyperspace travel in storytelling include the energy requirements for accessing higher dimensions, with estimates suggesting it could approach Planck Energy levels. Fusion reactors or quantum singularities are proposed as potential energy sources for this purpose. The discussion also explores whether travel in hyperspace is instantaneous or faster than light, and the practicality of having a space-based entry point, akin to concepts in Babylon 5. Aesthetic considerations for depicting hyperspace involve visualizing it as a realm of plasmatic reactions and turbulent waves influenced by gravitational dynamics. Overall, these elements contribute to a deeper understanding of how hyperspace can be integrated into narrative frameworks.
SSan
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have some various questions for a story I'm writing.

How much energy is required to access a higher dimension?

Could Fusion Reactors or Quantum Singularities provide enough energy?

How much faster than the speed of light do you travel, or do you just arrive instantaneously?

Is it practical/tactical to have a space based opening into Hyperspace(like in Babylon 5)?

And for aesthetic purposes, what would Hyperspace look like?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
SSan said:
I have some various questions for a story I'm writing.

How much energy is required to access a higher dimension?

Could Fusion Reactors or Quantum Singularities provide enough energy?

How much faster than the speed of light do you travel, or do you just arrive instantaneously?

Is it practical/tactical to have a space based opening into Hyperspace(like in Babylon 5)?

And for aesthetic purposes, what would Hyperspace look like?
I'm not a physics or math guru (just a fellow story writer), but from what I remember from Dr. Kaku's Hyperspace, accessing a higher dimension would require energies approaching the Planck Energy (1.22 x 10 to the 19th billion electron volts). Think of the next higher spatial dimension as a way to possibly access any point in the universe instantly. Do you know the Flatland analogies? A creature in 2 spatial dimensions in the center of a square could never figure out how to move away from ALL sides at the same time because he can't imagine UP. Similarly, we 3-Ders can't figure out how to move away from all sides of a sphere simultaneously, but a 4th spatial dimension would probably do it. A 4-D person might look just like us except he would disappear or seem to fly or walk through walls or sink into the ground whenever he moved into the 4th spatial dimension. I hope this helps.
 
Phi For All said:
I'm not a physics or math guru (just a fellow story writer), but from what I remember from Dr. Kaku's Hyperspace, accessing a higher dimension would require energies approaching the Planck Energy (1.22 x 10 to the 19th billion electron volts). Think of the next higher spatial dimension as a way to possibly access any point in the universe instantly. Do you know the Flatland analogies? A creature in 2 spatial dimensions in the center of a square could never figure out how to move away from ALL sides at the same time because he can't imagine UP. Similarly, we 3-Ders can't figure out how to move away from all sides of a sphere simultaneously, but a 4th spatial dimension would probably do it. A 4-D person might look just like us except he would disappear or seem to fly or walk through walls or sink into the ground whenever he moved into the 4th spatial dimension. I hope this helps.

The Grand unification requires gravity to be included. But we look at the high energy states. We need a way in which to understand these dynamics.

Here we might say, from a weak field measure, gravity to supergravity (metric point considerations) and in this supersymmetrical state, metric point consideration has just be moved to higher mathematical definition?

Visually, you are see plasmatic reactions and turbulent waves generated in those baths, yet the flowing nature is still understood based on these gravitational considerations?

I could be wrong though and I am open to corrections
 
Last edited:
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top