alan123hk said:
Sure. But it's easy to get caught up in all kinds of philosophy and pop-science and pseudo-science if you don't take the time to learn the basics of science well, and then more advanced mainstream science from reputable sources. You can't just skip over lots of important learning of the basics and start trying to discuss QM and intelligence. And that's what Dave and others are trying to be sure you understand.alan123hk said:
These questions are much too philosophical for this forum. This forum is for learning physics. It's for students and newcomers to physics. Members can help out these newcomers to learn physics.alan123hk said:
Agreed.lekh2003 said:
The ultimate limit of scientific exploration in the universe is unknown, as our understanding of the universe is constantly evolving and expanding. There may always be mysteries and questions that science may not be able to fully answer.
It is unlikely that science will ever be able to fully explain all of the mysteries of the universe. As we continue to make new discoveries and advancements, new questions and mysteries will also arise.
Yes, there are limitations to what science can discover in the universe. For example, some phenomena may be beyond our current technology or understanding, and some areas of the universe may be too far or too dangerous for us to explore.
The human perspective can both aid and limit our ability to explore the mysteries of the universe. Our curiosity and desire to understand the universe drive scientific exploration, but our biases and limited perception may also hinder our understanding of the universe.
While scientific theories and models can provide valuable insights and explanations for the workings of the universe, they are simplified representations and may not fully capture the complexity of the universe. As our understanding grows, these theories and models may also need to be revised or replaced.