Stargazing What are the Limits of Wavelength Detection in Modern Telescopes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Telescope
AI Thread Summary
Modern telescopes, such as the LOFAR, can detect wavelengths as long as 7 meters, which corresponds to a frequency of about 10 MHz. This capability raises questions about the accuracy of reported sensitivities and the significance of such long wavelengths in astronomical research. While long wavelengths have not been a primary focus in astronomy, there are other instruments, like the Cambridge pulsar array, that also explore this range. The interest in high-energy wavelengths often overshadows the study of lower frequencies. Overall, the detection of long wavelengths remains an area with potential for further exploration and understanding.
Zman
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
What are the longest wavelengths that todays telescopes can detect for?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Probably something like lofar (10MHz = 30m)
 
I looked up the Lofar telescope on the web and in a slashdot comment;

http://science.slashdot.org/story/1...cope-Array-Grabs-First-Pulsar-Images?from=rss

it says that it is sensitive to wavelengths as long as 7 metres. Is this a mistake?
I can see that 10Mhz relates to a 30m wavelength.

Are there other telescopes in astronomy that can detect long wavelengths?
 
Probably the 10MHz band isn't built yet. I don't know if it's a particularly important part or just the ultimate limit of the antenna.

Generally long wavelengths haven't been much of a focus, high energy is more sexy.
Probably the most famous is the cambridge (MRAO) pulsar array.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...

Similar threads

Replies
42
Views
414
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
54
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top